Attaching James (Jas) is pure guesswork and gut feeling, no evidence whatsoever of how James came to be in the USA or if he is the first to cross the big pond, any evidence of where he came from or who his parents are would be greatly appreciated.
_________________________________________
American Genealogical-Biographical Index
Name: James PASTERFIELD Birth Date: 175? Birthplace: Maryland Volume: 132 Page Number: 64 Reference: Heads of fams. At the first U.S. census. Md. By U.S. Bureau of the Census. Washington, 1907. (189p.): 77
_________________________________________
1783
Assessment/Interpretation of Maryland State Archives
Kent County, MSA S 1437
James Pasterfield ...... KE 1st District, page 11, MSA S 1161-7-1 ....... 1/4/5/50
__________________________________________
1790
The census of 1790 at Harford, Maryland, USA
Page 77, Line 100, MD, Harford, microfilm M637-3
Jas (James) Pasterfield is shown as the head of a FREE WHITE household with males 16+ = 1 (him), upto 16 = 2 and females = 2, no other free persons or slaves.
----------------------------------------------------------------
1812-1815
The British Invasion of Maryland, 1812-1815, Surnames, O-P, Page 400
PASTERFIELD, Caleb. Corporal in Capt. Dillons' Co, 27th rgt.
______________________________________
1830 census
Baltimore, third ward, line 1, page 129
Caleb Pasterfield aged 40 to 50 is the head of the household with wife of the same age, plus 5 children. One female aged 5-10, two females aged 10-15, one male aged 5-10 and one male aged 15-20.
---------------------------------------
James Pasterfield (son of James/Jas Pasterfield) as the head of the family is seen living in Parsons Creek with 2 free white males (one being himself), 1 x aged 5 to 10 and 1 x aged 40 to 50,
also recorded is 1 x free white female aged 30 to 40. No slaves are recorded against them.
One assumes from the information above that James "junior" is at this time aged 40 to 50 years old and therefore born in the 1790's and also seeing that he married in 1815 one can also assume that it was pre 1795 at which time he would have been twenty years of age. His wife named Harriet one assumes wasn't born before 1798 at which time she would have been seventeen.
Taking in the information above and from the 1790 census of his father James one can also assume that James (junior) could have been born in the 1780's (1790 census states 2 males of the age 16 and under)
____________________________________
1860 US census, District 4
Maryland, Dorchester. Town: Tobacco Stick
Series: M653, Roll 473, Part 1, Page 981
James Pasterfield 60 M Laborer born Maryland value of real estate = 150 value of personal estate = 175
Harriet " 50 F " "
Bennett " 17 M " "
JAMES married HARRIET on the 1st September 1814 which means if the 1860 census (declared ages) was correct JAMES would have been 14 years old and HARRIET would have been 4 at that time, enumerator or vanity?
_________________________________
1870 US census, Maryland, Dorchester, Taylors Island
PASTERFIELD
James, 82, M, W, Ship Carpenter, b Maryland
Harriet, 75, F, W, Keeping House, b Maryland
__________________________________
1880 census Maryland, Dorchester,
Harriet Pasterfield 80 keeping house in old age, born Maryland
Arthur Gerghegan 13 nephew at school " "