Author Topic: Dorset marriage Baglin 1830  (Read 2131 times)

Offline trish1120

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 28,244
  • Happy me
    • View Profile
Re: Dorset marriage Baglin 1830
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 10 December 16 09:44 GMT (UK) »
Hi corblimey,
Have you considered that they never Married?

I presume this is them in 1841 in St Marylebone?
Tho BAGLIN, 32, Tailor
Martha Baglin, 32
James Mullins, 18, Tailor
Charlotte Mullins, 22, Independant
Ellen Baglin, 9
Margaret Ricketts, 13
Matilda Baglin, 1
All not born in County except Margaret Ricketts and Matilda Baglin

So Martha was nee Mullins according to post 1837 Birth Regs of their Children.

Thomas BAGLIN was the illeg Son of LOIS Baglin Christened 3 September 1809 Uley, Glous
(Familysearch.Org)


Thomas's Mother in 1841 in Uley;
Samuel Ricketts, 35
Louis Ricketts, 50
Charles Ricketts, 15
Charlotte Ricketts, 10

Samuel/Lois Married 24 Apr 1821, Uley (Anc.)


Martha MULLENS was likely Christened 19 Feb 1809 Hawkchurch, Dorset to JAMES/CHARLOTTE
(Eng Birth.Christenings on Anc)
James MULLINS Married Charlotte TUCKER 30 June 1803, St John the Baptist, Hawkchurch
James was of Axminster Parish (FreeREG)
Other Children on F/S Hawkchurch;
JAMES Mullens 7 April 1811
MATILDA Mullons 17 Feb 1819

You may already have all of this.

Cheers,
Trish :)
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Cummins, Miskelly(IRELAND + NZ) ,Leggett (SFK + NFK ENGLAND + NZ),Purdy ( NBL ENGLAND + NZ ), Shaw YKS, LANCs + NZ), Holdsworth(LINCS +LANCS + NZ), Moloney, Dean, Fitzpatrick, ( County Down,IRE) Newby(NBL.ENG, Costello(IRE), Ivers, Murray(IRE),Reay(NBL.ENG) Reid (BERW.SCOTLAND)

Offline corblimey

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Dorset marriage Baglin 1830
« Reply #10 on: Saturday 10 December 16 10:24 GMT (UK) »
Hello Trish
Thank you so much.  I do have most of that information but the marriage of Thomas Baglin and Martha Mullins is not to be found.  It may well be that they didn't marry.  I know that it was not uncommon for people not to marry in a church or registry office.  Sometimes they just had to give their vows in front of two reliable witnesses.