Hi
I have been researching the Severne's of Derby for some weeks and it has proved to be fascinating stuff ...
With regards to Thomas Herbert Severne and Mary Ann CROCOMB I can contribute the following ...
Francis and Louisa’s son Thomas Herbert Severne, born around 1826, made the journey to Nottingham on 18th October 1842 with Mary Ann Crocomb, who was also under 21 years of age. There, Mary falsely swore an affidavit to the effect that they were both over 21, procured a marriage licence from a Nottingham surrogate named Mr. Almond and underwent the ceremony that same day without the knowledge or consent of Thomas’ widowed mother. On learning of the under age marriage Louisa went to the courts so that …
… it might be declared that M.A.Severne [nee Crocomb], having offended as aforesaid, had forfeited all estate, right, title and interest in any property which had accrued or should accrue to her by force of the said marriage; and that all proper directions might be given by the Court for securing all such estate, right, title and interest for the benefit of T. Severne and the issue of the said marriage, or some of them, in such manner as the Court should think fit, for the purpose of preventing the said M.A. Severne from having any interest in any real or personal estate, or any pecuniary benefit from the same marriage.
In other words, Louisa did not want Mary to benefit in the slightest from the legacy that Thomas would receive on him reaching the age of 21. The case is covered by the Law Journals where the arguments for and against are discussed at length but, frustratingly, the conclusion of the hearing was to adjourn (to some later unspecified date) so that all parties may have time to acquire and present further evidence.
I have attached a narrative of my findings so far which includes some historical context ...
Please feel free to challenge and/or contribute.
Cheers.