Author Topic: who was Mary Jane ??? b 1867 - we think Ludlow  (Read 3346 times)

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: who was Mary Jane ??? b 1867 - we think Ludlow
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday 10 July 13 08:58 BST (UK) »
Birth registration:

Mar q 1866, Ludlow, 6a 547
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline garstonite

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,885
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: who was Mary Jane ??? b 1867 - we think Ludlow
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday 10 July 13 09:06 BST (UK) »
Thanks for joining in Gadget - appreciate any help ....
1901 census says Thomas and Mary Jane BOTH b Ludlow ....Alice b Ludlow - so you would expect the marriage to be in Ludlow .....Mary Jane b 1866/67 ...according to both census returns ...can`t see a marriage in 1881 in Wolverhampton and then no kids for 4 years ...the 1885 Alice birth to Mary Jane ??? and not as Watkins looks much more viable ...so
Gadget - can you explain why Mary Jane Catstree has taken your eye ??....I don`t quite understand why ?
added...can`t see an Alice Catstree b 1885 - so ...but - is it a coincidence that Ludloe is very prominent for that surname - and there are a couple in Liverpool as well ??
oakes,liverpool..neston..backford..poulton cum spittal(bebington)middlewich,cheshire......   sacht,helgoland  .......merrick,herefordshire adams,shropshire...tipping..ellis..  jones,garston,liverpool..hartley.dunham massey..barker. salford

Online KGarrad

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,100
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: who was Mary Jane ??? b 1867 - we think Ludlow
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday 10 July 13 09:08 BST (UK) »
1911 census info removed: assistance is limited to what may be found in the FREE indexes.

Still can't find a marriage! ::)
Garrad (Suffolk, Essex, Somerset), Crocker (Somerset), Vanstone (Devon, Jersey), Sims (Wiltshire), Bridger (Kent)

Offline garstonite

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,885
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: who was Mary Jane ??? b 1867 - we think Ludlow
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday 10 July 13 09:10 BST (UK) »
Neither can I ....frustrating this ...what`s new ...lol
oakes,liverpool..neston..backford..poulton cum spittal(bebington)middlewich,cheshire......   sacht,helgoland  .......merrick,herefordshire adams,shropshire...tipping..ellis..  jones,garston,liverpool..hartley.dunham massey..barker. salford


Offline Annette7

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,009
    • View Profile
Re: who was Mary Jane ??? b 1867 - we think Ludlow
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday 10 July 13 09:14 BST (UK) »
What about this:

Marriage Sept.qtr.1887 Ludlow, Shropshire - 4 people listed and 2 of them are:

Thomas Watkins Preece and Mary Jane H. Lloyd.

Annette
Scopes (One-Name Study - Worldwide)
Suffolk - Grist, Knights, Bullenthorpe, Watcham
Scotland - Spence, Horne, Cowan, Moffat
London -  Monk

Don't walk behind me, I may not lead.   Don't walk in front of me, I may not follow.   Just walk beside me and be my friend.

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Annette7

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,009
    • View Profile
Re: who was Mary Jane ??? b 1867 - we think Ludlow
« Reply #14 on: Wednesday 10 July 13 09:17 BST (UK) »
According to familysearch the marriage took place 28/9/1887 at Ludlow and the H in Mary Jane's name stands for Husk.

Annette
Scopes (One-Name Study - Worldwide)
Suffolk - Grist, Knights, Bullenthorpe, Watcham
Scotland - Spence, Horne, Cowan, Moffat
London -  Monk

Don't walk behind me, I may not lead.   Don't walk in front of me, I may not follow.   Just walk beside me and be my friend.

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline garstonite

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,885
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: who was Mary Jane ??? b 1867 - we think Ludlow
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday 10 July 13 09:27 BST (UK) »
According to familysearch the marriage took place 28/9/1887 at Ludlow and the H in Mary Jane's name stands for Husk.

Annette
This looks good - don`t quite understand why -  but my wife has just said that Annie b 1894 married a Husk and went to live in Senghennyd , in the Welsh Valleys ...which is where my wifes cousin lives now ...too much of a coincidence ??... I wonder if there is an Alice Lloyd b 1885 Ludlow ...going to check
thanks for joining in Annette ...it`s all starting to take shape
added...jun qtr 1885 Alice Lloyd  Ludlow ...I know it`s a common name - but there is one there ...
oakes,liverpool..neston..backford..poulton cum spittal(bebington)middlewich,cheshire......   sacht,helgoland  .......merrick,herefordshire adams,shropshire...tipping..ellis..  jones,garston,liverpool..hartley.dunham massey..barker. salford

Offline Annette7

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,009
    • View Profile
Re: who was Mary Jane ??? b 1867 - we think Ludlow
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday 10 July 13 09:32 BST (UK) »
Thomas Watkins bc.1864 (according to marriage entry).   Census shows him to be son of Thomas Watkins and wife Elizabeth.

Looks like they'd been practising before marriage as Thomas Watkins married Elizabeth Preece 19/3/1865 Ludlow, Shropshire.

Annette
Scopes (One-Name Study - Worldwide)
Suffolk - Grist, Knights, Bullenthorpe, Watcham
Scotland - Spence, Horne, Cowan, Moffat
London -  Monk

Don't walk behind me, I may not lead.   Don't walk in front of me, I may not follow.   Just walk beside me and be my friend.

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: who was Mary Jane ??? b 1867 - we think Ludlow
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday 10 July 13 09:35 BST (UK) »
It was the Preece bit that confused - well found Annette!

Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***