Author Topic: John Ramsay Birth 1808  (Read 2329 times)

Offline DeeWhy

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
John Ramsay Birth 1808
« on: Tuesday 19 August 14 07:04 BST (UK) »
I have located a birth record of a John Ramsay in Coupar Angus in 1808 with details as follows:

"John Ramsay in Keithock and Janet Crichton his wife had a child baptised called John 20th May"

Keithock appears to be only a Farm House just outside Brechin. Would this mean that the baptism occurred at the farm house as I am unable to locate a church in the area. I have been unsuccessful in locating a marriage record of John and Janet if anyone can assist in locating a marriage record I would be most grateful.

Peter

Offline AdrianB38

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 244
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John Ramsay Birth 1808
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 19 August 14 12:28 BST (UK) »
Strictly speaking I would read that as saying where John Ramsay lived. You imply that the baptism is recorded in the register for Coupar Angus (a parish split between Angus and Perthshire), so that would be the church. Possibly.

However - at this era, it seems that in Scotland baptisms (and marriages) tended to take place outside the church and at the home. This took me, brought up in England, some time to realise - I know we shouldn't assume but I didn't realise I was assuming. So it is very likely that the baptism did take place in Keithock.

The other aspect is - what was Keithock? Something that is a farm now might have been a slightly larger cluster of dwellings, possibly connected to the farm in some way. I've seen relatives recorded as born at X, where X is just two houses now, but in the 1851 census there are many more people recorded as born or living there than would fit in two small houses. I think many of these settlements around farms shrunk as people moved into towns. In fact, many disappeared - on an old map, that X was accompanied by two other nearby settlements, both totally vanished apart from tracks going there for no apparent reason now.

So while you may have found a Keithock near Brechin now, there may have been other Keithocks, with one near Coupar Angus. You have to get hold of some old maps and have a look - start with the NLS site http://maps.nls.uk/. I've been caught myself by near-duplicate place-names in the past - there's still some I don't know which they were.

Alternatively, it could be that your Keithock really is near Brechin and there is some reason for the minister of Coupar Angus to record the child's birth - e.g. one of the parents came from there.


Offline Forfarian

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,072
  • http://www.rootschat.com/links/01ruz/
    • View Profile
Re: John Ramsay Birth 1808
« Reply #2 on: Monday 23 October 17 20:32 BST (UK) »
It's in Coupar Angus http://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=16&lat=56.5316&lon=-3.2978&layers=5&b=1 - just spelled slightly different. Still there http://www.geograph.org.uk/gridref/NO2038

In general, a place name mentioned in a pre-1855 parish register is always in the parish where the event is recorded, unless otherwise specified. You get occasional exceptions, of course, if a place is very close to the boundary of a parish, or if the parish clerk is having an off day.

But it is never safe to assume that the only place you can find on a modern road map with the same name but two counties (or even half a county) away is the right place.
Never trust anything you find online (especially submitted trees and transcriptions on Ancestry, MyHeritage, FindMyPast and other commercial web sites) unless it's an image of an original document - and even then be wary because errors can and do occur.