Author Topic: Confusion concerning census relations  (Read 2856 times)

Offline *Sandra*

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 58,726
  • Marie Curie
    • View Profile
Re: Confusion concerning census relations
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 28 September 14 17:41 BST (UK) »
Quote:- sorry I didn't correct the mistranslations. I knew there were some before I posted, but forgot to change the census as they should have been

That is absolutely awful -  >:( >:( >:(

Try Uriah Farthing - aged 88 years - Bridgend - 11 a 894 - he seems to fit

Sandra
"We search for information, but the burden of proof is always with the thread owner"

Census information is Crown Copyright  http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

British Census copyright The National Archives; Canadian Census copyright Library and Archives Canada

Offline *Sandra*

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 58,726
  • Marie Curie
    • View Profile
Re: Confusion concerning census relations
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 28 September 14 17:53 BST (UK) »
William Lacey and Rose Lacey were born before the marriage of Sarah Lacey and Uriah Farthing.
Don't forget the 1881 census says Sarah is widowed - so there was another marriage. Perhaps birth cert of William H Lacey will through more light on who his father was.

Sandra
"We search for information, but the burden of proof is always with the thread owner"

Census information is Crown Copyright  http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

British Census copyright The National Archives; Canadian Census copyright Library and Archives Canada

Offline sirsimon

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,672
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Confusion concerning census relations
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 28 September 14 18:08 BST (UK) »
thanks again and my apologies

Offline JJen

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,360
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Confusion concerning census relations
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 28 September 14 18:17 BST (UK) »
There is a marriage of a John Lacey -
 
q4 1870, Pontypool, Vol11a Page 231

On the same page is a Sarah Harvey

Death of John Lacey age 30 -

q2 1877, Bedwelty, Vol11a Page 59

So possibly these are the parents of William and Rosa, however to confirm who the parents are you would need to purchase a birth cert.

JJ


Offline sirsimon

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,672
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Confusion concerning census relations
« Reply #13 on: Monday 29 September 14 12:32 BST (UK) »
I will once I get some funds. I will let you know what it says

Offline sirsimon

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,672
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Confusion concerning census relations
« Reply #14 on: Thursday 13 November 14 14:36 GMT (UK) »
Got the birth certificate of Rosa Lacey today, William's sister, Jen is right, their parents are John Lacey and Sarah Harvey  :)

From this we now know that Sarah remarried Uriah