William Shackleton

[heywood]

Good idea to check again.

Have you seen Rose with James in 1851?

[Gibby1968]

This is the link for Rose's marriage to James Stell;

http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=WYorkCoEMarriage&h=21720411&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt&ssrc=pt_t71256687_p44233626196_kpidz0q3d44233626196z0q26pgz0q3d32768z0q26pgplz0q3dpid

[Gibby1968]

And this is the link to Rose's marriage to William Shackleton;

http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=WYorkCoEMarriage&h=21719597&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt&ssrc=pt_t71256687_p44233626196_kpidz0q3d44233626196z0q26pgz0q3d32768z0q26pgplz0q3dpid

[Gibby1968]

1861 census for Rose and James;

RG 9/3227/101 p2

[Gibby1968]

There is a Joseph Shackleton living with them who is listed as a son-in-law.

[Goughy]

The links you've given are those I tracked to find the 1851 census, and it is the same family. 

The "Joseph Shackleton - Son-in-law"  from evidence from baptism records, 1851 census, is Rose's son (born Joseph Hindle).  "Son-in-law" doesn't necessarily have the same meaning as today, it often referred to "adopted son".   

Possible marriage of Joseph Hindle to Margaret Heys 5 September 1869 - "father unknown"

In relation to Joseph's siblings:  Levi Hindle could have died in 1856.  Not found a possible death or marriage for Sarah Hannah. 

Goughy

[heywood]

Yes same here- that is the information I used.

Rose is already in the same household as James Stell in 1851, as is her son Joseph.
Son in law = stepson.

[Gibby1968]

Thanks for the information. 

[Gibby1968]

A friend has also picked up the same 1851 information.

I am trying to fit all the pieces together.