Author Topic: Archiepiscopal licence for marriage  (Read 5262 times)

Offline jennywren001

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,120
  • Me with yet another pudding bowl haircut...
    • View Profile
Archiepiscopal licence for marriage
« on: Monday 23 March 15 09:55 GMT (UK) »
Hi, am I correct in thinking that such a licence would let you get married somewhere other than a church.  The licence was applied for in 1848 in Norfolk.
Many thanks
Jen
North East Scotland above the Tay...
JOLLY, Johnston,Thom, Rae, Davidson, Fielding, Sherret
FEARN, McKenzie, Stirling [brick wall], Robb, Wilson, Stott
RUSSELL, Fullerton, Christie, Cochrane, Davidson, Coutts, Easton, Scott
FRASER, Henderson, Noble, Mundie, Goodall, Thain, Neish, Moir

Offline Marmalady

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,697
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Archiepiscopal licence for marriage
« Reply #1 on: Monday 23 March 15 10:14 GMT (UK) »
I don't think so

The license merely did away with the need for the Banns to read in the parish church(es) of the bride & groom for 3 weeks

At that time, a marriage had to be held in a church or register office to be legal
Wainwright - Yorkshire
Whitney - Herefordshire
Watson -  Northamptonshire
Trant - Yorkshire
Helps - all
Needham - Derbyshire
Waterhouse - Derbyshire
Northing - all

Offline jennywren001

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,120
  • Me with yet another pudding bowl haircut...
    • View Profile
Re: Archiepiscopal licence for marriage
« Reply #2 on: Monday 23 March 15 10:59 GMT (UK) »
Many thanks for the information Marmalady. I'll let my friend know.
Jen
North East Scotland above the Tay...
JOLLY, Johnston,Thom, Rae, Davidson, Fielding, Sherret
FEARN, McKenzie, Stirling [brick wall], Robb, Wilson, Stott
RUSSELL, Fullerton, Christie, Cochrane, Davidson, Coutts, Easton, Scott
FRASER, Henderson, Noble, Mundie, Goodall, Thain, Neish, Moir

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Archiepiscopal licence for marriage
« Reply #3 on: Monday 23 March 15 11:07 GMT (UK) »
Hi, am I correct in thinking that such a licence would let you get married somewhere other than a church.  The licence was applied for in 1848 in Norfolk.
Many thanks
Jen

A Special Ecclesiastical Licence from the Faculty Office of the Archbishop of Canterbury,  permitted a marriage to be solemnised at any time and at any place, consecrated or not. Prior to 1755 both the Vicar General and the Master of Faculties were able to grant Special Licences, but after 20 January 1755 only the latter issued them. Today the fee payable for a Special Licence (issued by the Faculty Office on behalf of the Archbishop of Canterbury) is £310.00.

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline jennywren001

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,120
  • Me with yet another pudding bowl haircut...
    • View Profile
Re: Archiepiscopal licence for marriage
« Reply #4 on: Monday 23 March 15 11:13 GMT (UK) »
Thanks Stan - as you may know I'm well out of my depth south of the border ;)
Jen
North East Scotland above the Tay...
JOLLY, Johnston,Thom, Rae, Davidson, Fielding, Sherret
FEARN, McKenzie, Stirling [brick wall], Robb, Wilson, Stott
RUSSELL, Fullerton, Christie, Cochrane, Davidson, Coutts, Easton, Scott
FRASER, Henderson, Noble, Mundie, Goodall, Thain, Neish, Moir

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Archiepiscopal licence for marriage
« Reply #5 on: Monday 23 March 15 11:13 GMT (UK) »
I don't think so
The license merely did away with the need for the Banns to read in the parish church(es) of the bride & groom for 3 weeks
At that time, a marriage had to be held in a church or register office to be legal

That is a Common/Ordinary Licence - This could be obtained from any bishop or archbishop, Chancellor or Surrogate, and meant the Banns need not be read - and so there was not the delay of two weeks. A sworn statement was given that there was no impediment [parties were not related to one another in the prohibited degrees, proof of deceased spouse given]. The marriage was required to take place in church or chapel where one party has already lived for 4 weeks. It was also good for 3 months from date of issue.

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Bookbox

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,917
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Archiepiscopal licence for marriage
« Reply #6 on: Monday 23 March 15 11:31 GMT (UK) »
I don't see any suggestion in the original post that this was a Special Licence from the Faculty Office.

Norfolk was covered by the Archdiocese of Canterbury. Most licences issued by the Archbishop of Canterbury were Common or Ordinary Licences, which functioned as described above.

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Archiepiscopal licence for marriage
« Reply #7 on: Monday 23 March 15 11:39 GMT (UK) »
I was explaining that it would have to be a Special Ecclesiastical Licence from the Faculty Office of the Archbishop of Canterbury, to enable you to  get married somewhere other than a church, as asked.

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Archiepiscopal licence for marriage
« Reply #8 on: Monday 23 March 15 13:15 GMT (UK) »
I don't see any suggestion in the original post that this was a Special Licence from the Faculty Office.

An "Archiepiscopal marriage licence"  is  an Archbishop's Marriage Licence, granted by the vicar general, and not an Ordinary Licence.
archiepiscopal: Of, pertaining to, or of the nature of, an archbishop. OED
Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk