Author Topic: Date for the lovely lady please.  (Read 2560 times)

Offline Wiggy

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,424
  • coloured by Gadget
    • View Profile
Re: Date for the lovely lady please.
« Reply #18 on: Friday 26 May 17 23:07 BST (UK) »
Having become rather aware of horizons lately, I am very interested in the fact that this photo seems to be sloping to the right.  -  just interesting nothing else.   ;D  Look at the skirting board line.

Think it is her 'cardi',  Carol  ;D  ;D
Gaunt, Ransom, McNally, Stanfield, Kimberley. (Tasmania)
Brown, Johnstone, Eskdale, Brand  (Dumfriesshire,  Scotland)
Booth, Bruerton, Deakin, Wilkes, Kimberley
(Warwicks, Staffords)
Gaunt (Yorks)
Percy, Dunning, Hyne, Grigg, Farley (Devon, UK)
Duncan (Fife, Devon), Hugh, Blee (Cornwall)
Green, Mansfield, (Herts)
Cavenaugh, Ransom (Middlesex)
 

 Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.

Offline Treetotal

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 28,450
    • View Profile
Re: Date for the lovely lady please.
« Reply #19 on: Friday 26 May 17 23:14 BST (UK) »
I think it's the backdrop that is uneven where it meets the floor, but I could be wrong.
Carol
CAPES Hull. KIRK  Leeds, Hull. JONES  Wales,  Lancashire. CARROLL Ireland, Lancashire, U.S.A. BROUGHTON Leicester, Goole, Hull BORRILL  Lincolnshire, Durham, Hull. GROOM  Wishbech, Hull. ANTHONY St. John's Nfld. BUCKNALL Lincolnshire, Hull. BUTT Harbour Grace, Newfoundland. PARSONS  Western Bay, Newfoundland. MONAGHAN  Ireland, U.S.A. PERRY Cheshire, Liverpool.
 
RESTORERS:PLEASE DO NOT USE MY RESTORES WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION - THANK YOU

Offline Handypandy

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,583
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Date for the lovely lady please.
« Reply #20 on: Friday 26 May 17 23:33 BST (UK) »
Having become rather aware of horizons lately, I am very interested in the fact that this photo seems to be sloping to the right. 

One for Wiggy...  ;D  Although I think the angle of the original tends to give it a more 'dynamic' look.

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,198
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Date for the lovely lady please.
« Reply #21 on: Saturday 27 May 17 02:05 BST (UK) »
What an interesting photo.

It appears that the photographer has taken this from above. I wonder if he was standing on something?  :) Unusual, and you can see the dark "corners" as though looking through the lens. It almost looks like a "second" except that it has been mounted (and I wouldn't expect a second to have been).

Nice restores and colours everyone.  :)


Offline Wiggy

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,424
  • coloured by Gadget
    • View Profile
Re: Date for the lovely lady please.
« Reply #22 on: Saturday 27 May 17 03:33 BST (UK) »
Thank Andy.   ;D ;D
Gaunt, Ransom, McNally, Stanfield, Kimberley. (Tasmania)
Brown, Johnstone, Eskdale, Brand  (Dumfriesshire,  Scotland)
Booth, Bruerton, Deakin, Wilkes, Kimberley
(Warwicks, Staffords)
Gaunt (Yorks)
Percy, Dunning, Hyne, Grigg, Farley (Devon, UK)
Duncan (Fife, Devon), Hugh, Blee (Cornwall)
Green, Mansfield, (Herts)
Cavenaugh, Ransom (Middlesex)
 

 Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.

Offline Handypandy

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,583
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Date for the lovely lady please.
« Reply #23 on: Saturday 27 May 17 09:14 BST (UK) »
What an interesting photo.

It appears that the photographer has taken this from above. I wonder if he was standing on something?  :) Unusual, and you can see the dark "corners" as though looking through the lens. It almost looks like a "second" except that it has been mounted (and I wouldn't expect a second to have been).

Nice restores and colours everyone.  :)

It is definitely interesting. I should like to see more of Pettingells work because I think, judging by this photo alone, he may have been an innovator. I think that everything in this image is deliberate. From the off-centre camera position and the slightly higher vantage point to the vignetting and as Carol describes, how the subject is placed to 'flow' from the scene in a more dynamic way than just a bog standard 'straight to camera' ....square on.. set-up. It strikes me as the work of an artist rather than just one for the records. An informal rather than the usual very formal composition.   

Offline Treetotal

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 28,450
    • View Profile
Re: Date for the lovely lady please.
« Reply #24 on: Saturday 27 May 17 09:23 BST (UK) »
I think you are right Andy and I do like the effect that he has created as if looking through a porthole. I wonder if he is trying to copy the early Daguerreotype style with the faded edges created by the matting of the union case that the were displayed in. Or maybe he was just experimenting with filters.
Carol
CAPES Hull. KIRK  Leeds, Hull. JONES  Wales,  Lancashire. CARROLL Ireland, Lancashire, U.S.A. BROUGHTON Leicester, Goole, Hull BORRILL  Lincolnshire, Durham, Hull. GROOM  Wishbech, Hull. ANTHONY St. John's Nfld. BUCKNALL Lincolnshire, Hull. BUTT Harbour Grace, Newfoundland. PARSONS  Western Bay, Newfoundland. MONAGHAN  Ireland, U.S.A. PERRY Cheshire, Liverpool.
 
RESTORERS:PLEASE DO NOT USE MY RESTORES WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION - THANK YOU

Offline a-l

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,681
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Date for the lovely lady please.
« Reply #25 on: Saturday 27 May 17 10:38 BST (UK) »
What a beautiful and unusual photo. Incredible work and different moods that the restorers have done ! Well done everyone in producing such results , truly amazing.