I have a marriage that I am comfortable occurred but the direct descendants are questioning it due to the age of the female at the time.
Here is the story as I see it.
- A farming couple marry, have 1 child, wife dies while child is an infant.
- The then 23 year old male widower, marries a then 11 or 12 year old female who is a daughter of an adjoining farm.
- Despite marrying in 1864 or 65, they don't have their first child together until the year the female will turn 16.
- Incidentally (or not) the family of the then 23 year old widower (and his second wife) still own the same land, and they also now own the land of the adjoining farm.
Evidence:
I have the civil marriage record from rootsireland and the catholic marriage record too.
It is the right townland.
The male is stated as a widower.
The only issue is the civil record is stated as 20 Nov 1864 and the catholic record states 15 Nov 1865. At the moment I think this is a typo on rootsirelands behalf.
The father of the girl, on the civil marriage record, is the same name as the father on the girls baptism record (which I also have from rootsireland). The first birth between the couple that I can find is 1869, then 1871, then 1873, then 1876. So they married in either 1864 or 65 (when the girl was either 1 month from being 12, or 1 month from being 13), and didn't start a family till 1869 (first child baptised when the girl was 15 years 4 months and the same year she would turn 16).
The descendants of the marriage say they are unconvinced the catholic church would have accepted such a marriage, and think the female must have been from elsewhere.
What sources are out there to prove that such a marriage would have occurred, to explain to the descendants?