Author Topic: OPR terminology  (Read 3309 times)

Offline jimmain

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 398
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: OPR terminology
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 04 July 15 13:15 BST (UK) »
Re my initial query: I noted that several birth records noted the parents as being 'in' a certain place, then later births noted them to being 'of' that same place.
An additional question. What is the difference between someone being noted as being 'of' a certain place, and someone else as being noted as 'portioner of ....'?
Main, Mitchell; Stirlingshire
Drummond; Perth
Florence; Aberdeen

Offline GR2

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,588
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: OPR terminology
« Reply #10 on: Saturday 04 July 15 13:48 BST (UK) »
A portioner is the owner of a part of a bigger property which has been divided. The land owned by a portioner might not be very extensive.

Offline Skoosh

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,736
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: OPR terminology
« Reply #11 on: Saturday 04 July 15 15:08 BST (UK) »
Anent, in,at & of. In = a tenant, at = a servant & of = the owner. this indication of the circumstances of the farm's occupier only referred to the occupant himself and possibly not always strictly adhered to.

A portioner can be a co-heir to a property, a small landowner or proprietor of a small estate, so not a tenant.

Skoosh.

Offline jimmain

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 398
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: OPR terminology
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 05 July 15 22:20 BST (UK) »
Another question: I note in the 1744 New Monkland parish records a discharge sent to William Main of Meadowhead , '...by bill... including print & one year's interest', of 136 pounds, 6 shillings. What would this represent? Below this entry is another one made to Robert Aitkin, portioned of Blairlin, for a lesser amount.
Main, Mitchell; Stirlingshire
Drummond; Perth
Florence; Aberdeen


Offline GR2

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,588
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: OPR terminology
« Reply #13 on: Sunday 05 July 15 23:18 BST (UK) »
People sometimes left money to the kirk session for the benefit of the parish, often for the poor, sometimes to maintain a bridge or the like. This sum was normally lent at interest to some landowner in the parish. This, hopefully, meant that the capital was secure and the interest was forthcoming annually to be applied for the intended purpose. It sounds as if that is what has happened here.

Offline jimmain

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 398
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: OPR terminology
« Reply #14 on: Monday 06 July 15 13:31 BST (UK) »
Thank you for that.
Main, Mitchell; Stirlingshire
Drummond; Perth
Florence; Aberdeen