Author Topic: Kirk sessions  (Read 4573 times)

Offline dottie43

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Kirk sessions
« on: Monday 06 July 15 19:22 BST (UK) »
hi
I am wondering if anyone can help me?
If a couple were taken up in front of church for fornacation, would this happen only if they went to church or even if they weren't a member of the church
Thank in advance for any help
Dottie

Offline deebel

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 560
    • View Profile
Re: Kirk sessions
« Reply #1 on: Monday 06 July 15 21:26 BST (UK) »
They would need to be members or adherents of the Kirk
This post is a natural hand made product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws. Unfortunately my preferred method of writing (Parker Quink on Basildon Bond) cannot be used.

Offline dottie43

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Kirk sessions
« Reply #2 on: Monday 06 July 15 21:47 BST (UK) »
Hi deebel
Thanks for your reply. That's what I thought myself. So many people with the same names, it's driving me crazy  >:(

Offline Skoosh

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,736
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Kirk sessions
« Reply #3 on: Monday 06 July 15 22:09 BST (UK) »
Dottie, it depends what period you're talking about. The Kirk not only looked after spiritual welfare it was also the social security system, there was no other.

Skoosh.


Offline dottie43

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Kirk sessions
« Reply #4 on: Monday 06 July 15 22:17 BST (UK) »
Hi skoosh
Thank you for your reply.
I am looking at 1878 in foggie, my g grandmother had a child in this year and unless I find some proof my mum won't believe that the man named as her grandfather is right.
I have them in 1881 census living together with her down as housekeeper, is this normal practice do you think?

Offline Skoosh

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,736
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Kirk sessions
« Reply #5 on: Monday 06 July 15 22:29 BST (UK) »
I take it this is Aberchirder Dottie? The Kirk had lost its hold by that time & the Free Church taken many of its members. The Session might disapprove of immorality but lacked teeth. All the best with the quest.

Skoosh.

Offline dottie43

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Kirk sessions
« Reply #6 on: Monday 06 July 15 22:37 BST (UK) »
Hi skoosh
Yes it is aberchirder that I meant.
Thank you for your help
Dottie.

Offline deebel

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 560
    • View Profile
Re: Kirk sessions
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday 07 July 15 13:44 BST (UK) »
Dottie have you tried Aberdeenshire Archives?

This post is a natural hand made product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws. Unfortunately my preferred method of writing (Parker Quink on Basildon Bond) cannot be used.

Offline dottie43

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Kirk sessions
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday 07 July 15 19:15 BST (UK) »
Hi deebel
Yes I have been to the archives, the info I got was a woman with the same name I am looking at but a different man.
When I looked at the marnoch births for 1878 there was only 2, one was my granda and the other is not conected to me.
I am going to have to wait until I go to edinburgh to check for the rest of Banffshire as there were a few and it works out pretty expensive
Thanks fo your reply
Dottie.