Dear Alan
A few years ago I did some research on the vestry minutes in Winchcombe parish, and I’ve just found the following entry in my notes:-
Friday 1 Feb 1822 - a vestry meeting was this day held in this parish church pursuant to the agreement of the meeting of the 29th January - that all possible inquiry as to the place of legal settlement of Richard Mansell and his wife and family shall be forthwith made and if it appear to be at any other place than Winchcomb they shall be removed to such place with the earliest convenience.
The implication of this is that if Richard Mansell’s legal settlement was Winchcombe then he and his family would be allowed to remain.
Since we know that Richard was living in Winchcombe in 1841 with three of his children, two of whom (Ann & Charles) were born after the church edict in 1820, then, on the face of it, the family seem to have continued to live in Winchcombe. If Richard and Ann had been forcibly separated then unless she could be returned to her place of settlement (possibly Bishops Cleeve) she would have become a charge on Winchcombe parish, which its overseers and churchwardens would have wanted to avoid. However, I have checked my notes of Winchcombe vestry meetings in the early 19th century up to the 1830s and found no record of the removal of Ann Mansell (or Ann Long) from Winchcombe parish.
So the evidence strongly suggests that Richard and Ann remained in Winchcombe, and that the hoo-hah died down. This is supported by the post-1820 baptisms of their younger children and the burial of Ann Mansell in 1835, which all took place at Winchcombe parish church.
ROB