Forby or Barrett/Barritt from Norfolk

[trish1120]

Hi Jason46,

Ok, lets start again;
Did your Mary Forby marry William BARRETT?
If so from what I have found she died 1839 (you have Mary 1759-1809)

This is the Burials I quoted earlier;
Burials;
St Mary, Tittleshall;
WILLIAM Barrett, 14 Feb 1806 age 63 (birth c 1743)
MARY Barrett, 7 Nov 1839 age 81 (birth c 1758)****

The Mary born c 1765 to Thomas/Susan would be too young to marry William Barrett in 1777.

The Mary who married Henry Francis 1770 would have to be born c 1750
From FreeREG she may have been Bapt 14 May 1749 at Tittleshall to Thomas/Mary Forby.

I dont have access to any Norfolk Records other than on-line ones, ie F/S.Org and FreeREG etc .

In my opinion Mary who married William Barrett is the Daug of Richard and Bapt 1759.

Trish

[Jason46]

This is my info:
William Barritt (not Barrett) born 1743, England, died  14 Feb Tittleshall, Norfolk, married Mary Forby 25 March 1777 at Tittleshall. She was christened 27 Dec 1759 at St Mary, Tittleshall, so she was 16 years younger than him. Mary Forby's parents could be
(1) Richard and Anne from Tittleshall or Belaugh, Norfolk, or
(2)Thomas and Susan from Stoke Ferry, Norfolk.
They had 6 recorded children, and my Sarah is not one of the 6, but it is the only Barritt family in Tittleshall, so i may be completely wrong. I already have Mary's father pencilled in as being Richard Forby, born 1735. There is a Richard Forby, christened 7 Mar 1735, son of Thomas Forby widower and Elizabeth Mitchell, who died 31 Jan, 1749 (LDS records)
What do you think -

[trish1120]

As I said earlier I think yours is the Daug of Richard.

The Mary born c 1765 to Thomas/Susan would be too young to marry William Barrett in 1777.

[Jason46]

I believe you are correct but I still don't have my Sarah being a child of Mary Forby. Mary has 6 known children but Sarah isn't among the 6 - Bummer!