Pages: 1 2 [3] 4

Author Topic: Daniel Kelly of Ticnock, Dublin  (Read 3510 times)

Offline dathai

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,078
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Daniel Kelly of Ticnock, Dublin
« Reply #18 on: Sunday 06 September 15 08:42 BST (UK) »
Marriage Sept 18th 1865 Sandyford
William Kelly son of Martin and Maria Kelly,Grange,Rathfarnham,  to
Margaret Farrell dtr of Thomas and Bridget Farrell,Ticknock
wits
Thomas Farrell,Rockbrooke
Maria Farrell, Kilmashogue

http://registers.nli.ie/registers/vtls000633827#page/14/mode/1up

Offline dathai

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,078
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Daniel Kelly of Ticnock, Dublin
« Reply #19 on: Sunday 06 September 15 08:59 BST (UK) »

Offline splask

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 61
  • -- one big family --
    • View Profile
Re: Daniel Kelly of Ticnock, Dublin
« Reply #20 on: Sunday 06 September 15 11:49 BST (UK) »
That could be Great-grandparents marriage alright, given that Thomas their first son was born in 1866.

Offline splask

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 61
  • -- one big family --
    • View Profile
Re: Daniel Kelly of Ticnock, Dublin
« Reply #21 on: Sunday 06 September 15 12:28 BST (UK) »
The 1901 census names/dates/location look to mostly match up too Dathai, though the ages don't match in the 1911 one.

Offline dathai

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,078
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Daniel Kelly of Ticnock, Dublin
« Reply #22 on: Sunday 06 September 15 12:52 BST (UK) »
Think pension
the pension was introduced about 1903 and there was loads of lies told on the 1911 census regards ages in order to qualify,however the government was wise to this and went back through the earlier census's that were not destroyed at this time to prove if they were telling the truth.

qualifing age was 70

Offline splask

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 61
  • -- one big family --
    • View Profile
Re: Daniel Kelly of Ticnock, Dublin
« Reply #23 on: Sunday 06 September 15 12:58 BST (UK) »
Great insight.  Two of them had indeed aged to exactly 70 by the 1911 census.

Offline splask

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 61
  • -- one big family --
    • View Profile
Re: Daniel Kelly of Ticnock, Dublin
« Reply #24 on: Sunday 06 September 15 14:18 BST (UK) »
Hey Dathai - a big shout out to you.  I wasn't familiar with the FamilySearch and IrishGenealogy sites, wouldn't have been able to piece this all together without your help.  Are you a Kelly btw?

Offline defrmangan

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 12
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Daniel Kelly of Ticnock, Dublin
« Reply #25 on: Friday 09 October 15 16:44 BST (UK) »
Do you have any info on the Kelly's from glencullen Co Dublin.

Offline dathai

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,078
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Daniel Kelly of Ticnock, Dublin
« Reply #26 on: Friday 09 October 15 20:53 BST (UK) »
Any names,dates etc
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4