Author Topic: Margaret Hanley  (Read 3114 times)

Offline taramcdsmall

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,394
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Margaret Hanley
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday 13 October 15 22:27 BST (UK) »
Timothy Hanly and Richard Stritch are here on GV

http://www.failteromhat.com/griffiths/longford/templemichael.htm

Tara

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline lamchop

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 2
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Margaret Hanley
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday 14 October 15 17:02 BST (UK) »
thanks everybody, challo put the post up for me,  sorry it took so long to get here, what I could never find was a marriage for my nan,  I have her birth cert so I knew were she was on 1901 census an on the 1911 she was in an industrial school with the nuns, I recently found out on FindMyPast on courts an legal records that her an a sister was found out without an adult an was put away for a few years that was in 1909, its great what you all have found out though, I didn't think her mum an dad would of married in 1880, I thought it would of been a few years before this because they both seem to be getting on a bit and also to have their parents names aswell,, thanks everyone

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline taramcdsmall

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,394
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Margaret Hanley
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday 14 October 15 17:35 BST (UK) »
Hi There Lamchop and Welcome

They defo married in 1880 as you can see by the link.

While Patrick could have been 60 in 1901 ~ I'd imagine that Elizabeth was about 40 in 1901.

Ages are notoriously incorrect on census'.

So, do you have all the info that you need now ?

Tara

Offline lamchop

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 2
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Margaret Hanley
« Reply #21 on: Thursday 15 October 15 11:48 BST (UK) »
hi Tara, yes I think that's about all im going find out for now, thanks again for all your help x

Offline taramcdsmall

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,394
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Margaret Hanley
« Reply #22 on: Thursday 15 October 15 12:25 BST (UK) »
No Probs

Sure come back to us if you need more help.

Tara