« Reply #7 on: Wednesday 06 January 16 23:12 GMT (UK) »
I read Smudwisk's original post and had just decided to ask how it was known that this completed the records before taking out a sub. You have now answered my question and saved me some money. Hopefully, as you say, they are working on other records and will get back to where you and I want to get to in due course
Tony
I didn't say they'd completed it, although I appreciate te phrasing may have suggested that. The "remaining" in this context were Marriages and pre1812 Baptisms and Burials which not included in last February's release. I'll amend the post so its a little clearer.
I'd be surprised knowing ancestry if there weren't gaps. That said, FindMyPast are as bad, Hertfordshire and Westminster being prime examples.
There's definitately a gap in Haselbech marriages between 1798 and 1808, I was looking for one I know is there (as have seen on the microfiche) for 1806.
Whether that's caused by NRO or ancestry, remains to be seen. It'll depend on who digitised the registers and I think from memory it was NRO.
At least if the whole register is missing, its easier to spot.
(KENT) Lingwell, Rayment (BUCKS) Read, Hutchins (SRY) Costin, Westbrook (DOR) Gibbs, Goreing (DUR) Green (ESX) Rudland, Malden, Rouse, Boosey (FIFE) Foulis, Russell (NFK) Johnson, Farthing, Purdy, Barsham (GLOS) Collett, Morris, Freebury, May, Kirkman (HERTS) Winchester, Linford (NORTHANTS) Bird, Brimley, Chater, Wilford, Read, Chapman, Jeys, Marston, Lumley (WILTS) Arden, Whatley, Batson, Gleed, Greenhill (SOM) Coombs, Watkins (RUT) Stafford (BERKS) Sansom, Angel, Young, Stratton, Weeks, Day