Hi Matti
Many thanks for the PM. As PM's are only really used for exchanging more confidential information and so that others are given the opportunity to help I will reply to your post here.
I'm a bit puzzled. There seems to be a similar family in the 1861 Census, but the name is written without ”e” Barns. All the names (Mary, Charles, Godfrey and Henry) match if ”Henry” is ”Harry”. Godfrey's birth place here is Bassaleg which is quite close to Newport where ”the other” Godfrey was born. So ”Bassaleg” could be ”Newport”.
The problem is the age of Godfrey's father which is only 26 in the 1861 Census (thus born in 1835). The other Charles was born in 1910.
In the 1871 Census there is no father with the family nor Mary (Godfrey's mother) was described widowed, ”Henry” is back to ”Harry” and the name has now ”e”. The older Charles died in 1879. What happened to the younger Charles? Could it just be an error with the age in the 1861 Census?........
The 1861 census that you are querying has been suggested by Keyboard
Charles Barno 26 occ Mason
Mary 31
George 3
Harry 1 b Pontypool
Census ref RG09/4008/41/26
The 1871 suggested RG10/2339/110/13
Mary Barnes 41 Usk, Monmouthshire (Married)
Godfrey 13 Newport, Monmouthshire
Harry 12 Pontypool, Monmouthshire
Edward 8 Penzance, Cornwall
Ada 6 Penzance, Cornwall
Emily 2 months Penzance, Cornwall
I am not seeing a Charles other than Godfrey's father
Mary is describes as married in 1871. Information on online trees should always be verified. Do not think something is right just because lots of trees have the same information, it is often because it has just been copied on without checking. Those trees do not have a death date for Charles bn c1834.
Rosie