1871 Census – RG 10/5072 pages 32 & 33
Agustine, Bibby, Head, 50, Lancashire, Liverpool
Anne, Bibby, Wife, 39, Do
William A, Bibby, Son, 17, London, Middlesex
Thomas H, Bibby, Son, 16, London, Do
Robert F, Bibby, Son, 14, Lancashire, Liverpool
James A, Bibby, Son, 12, Do
Elizabeth E, Bibby, Daughter, 10, Newcastle on Tyne
Albert E, Bibby, Son, 8, Durham, Gateshead
Allice P, Bibby, Daughter, 6, Newcastle on Tyne
David H, Bibby, Son, 4, Newcastle on Tyne
John B, Bibby, Son, 1, Do
I would not be confident on this image to transcribe the letter as either F or T.
The enumerator slips between a similar letter when writing Tyne and Fitter though the loop is slightly smaller on writing Tyne.
1861 Census – RG 9/3811 page 13
Augustin, Bibby, Head, 40, Lancashire, Liverpool
Annie, Bibby, Wife, 29, Do
William A, Bibby, Son, 9, Middlesex, St Luke's
Thomas H, Bibby, Son, 6, Do, Do
William H, Bibby, Son, 4, Lancashire, Liverpool
James A, Bibby, Son, 2, Do, Do
Elizabeth, Bibby, Daughter, 3 mths, Newcastle Tyne
It does seem that for some reason Robert F, Bibby, Son, 14 on the 1871 census is the same person as William H, Bibby, Son, 4 but either the family changed the name or the enumerator made an error as the images clearly show Robert & William.
Cheers
Guy
