Yes, could well be, as it seems that Aubert did morph into Albert over time (and/or vice versa, if this is to be believed:
http://www.surnamedb.com/Surname/Aubert - although here's a different version of its orgins:
https://www.houseofnames.com/aubert-family-crest).
Only now I'm further confused, having scrolled forward and found a son of Thomas Aubert buried 15 April 1711 - no name, possibly stillborn (img 36, rhs) and another son, Edward, baptised 14 Aug 1714 (img 37, rhs - name looking a bit like Aubrett or Arbutt, but probably Aubert). These would have been after the death of the Mary who died in 1707, but I haven't seen him re-marry before them. Always possible that I missed something though.
And I passed by an Elizabeth Smith in the earlier records - probably that one that looks like Sneth. (And found a couple of sons of Nicholas Terr(e)y/Terroy and a daughter Elizabeth, but a bit too late to be the same generation as Mary Terrey.)
Yes, it would be a LOT easier if they listed the women's names, who after all did all the hard work of carrying and bearing the babies!!
I guess there's nothing for it but to put my nose to the grindstone and trawl through some more records...
[Edit: Oh, and there was also a son Joseph, of
Henry Albert born 23 Oct 1701 - either a previous wife, or not Henry Aubert this time, although I don't recall spotting any other Alberts.]
[Another edit: nothing yet, but note the baby born at the top left of image 37, where the mother's name is given, but the child labelled a Bastard - although can't quite read the name or the words beginning with "w".
]
Mel
