Author Topic: Silly census question  (Read 5575 times)

Offline clairec666

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,116
  • My great-great-grandfather in his signalbox
    • View Profile
Re: Silly census question
« Reply #27 on: Monday 11 April 16 11:39 BST (UK) »
I have a 3xgreat-uncle whose family "goes missing" in 1881. They were a farming family in Kent and all their children were baptised in the same village, where they lived in both 1871 and 1891. No sign of them in 1881. It's only a small village so I've looked through the images for the whole village. I can only assume that they were missed somehow, and I've had to accept I'll never find them.
Transcribing Essex records for FreeREG.
Current parishes - Burnham, Purleigh, Steeple.
Get in touch if you have any interest in these places!

Offline jesika jae

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 65
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Silly census question
« Reply #28 on: Monday 11 April 16 14:07 BST (UK) »
Once again, my thanks to all who have read my question.
I had considered the Suffragette supporters idea & dismissed it.
I had considered a holiday, possible but unlikely because the head of the family was a miner and certainly in the mining village where I grew up, holidays were in the summer not spring.
I had NOT thought that the enumerator might have been less than meticulous or that the papers simply lost.
I thank you all & ask please not to pursue the question further, your time & efforts can be better spent on more important topics.
Many thanks
jj

Offline philipsearching

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,092
  • I was a beautiful baby - what went wrong?
    • View Profile
Re: Silly census question
« Reply #29 on: Monday 11 April 16 14:20 BST (UK) »
I thank you all & ask please not to pursue the question further, your time & efforts can be better spent on more important topics.

You are very welcome, but I have to add that questions like yours are fun!  Personally, I really appreciate questions that make me do some thinking.  :)
Please help me to help you by citing sources for information.

Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Silly census question
« Reply #30 on: Monday 11 April 16 17:00 BST (UK) »
Several weeks after each main Census  a small sample "check" census is undertaken.   Probably a computer generates the addresses at random.

If you look at the 1871 census transcriptions I did in 2000 you will see the later additions in red.
http://www.rootschat.com/links/01hfg/

This Bottesford part of the census was -
Transcribed by enumerator, Henry Norris, on  07 April 1871
Examined by Registrar, Charles Goodson, on 24 April 1871
Examined by Superintendent Registrar, R H Johnston, 16 May 1871
Revised by H Graves 22nd August 1871

Cheers
Guy

"The enumerator's books were supposed to be checked by the registrars and superintendent registrars before dispatch to the Census Office in London. In the Cesus Office the books were gone over again to sort out any problems or ambiguities in the data, reference no doubt being made to the household schedules."  "Making Sense of the Census Revisited" Edward Higgs.

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline ScouseBoy

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,142
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Silly census question
« Reply #31 on: Monday 11 April 16 17:35 BST (UK) »
When did Edward Higgs write that, though?
Nursall   ~    Buckinghamshire
Avies ~   Norwich

Offline jesika jae

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 65
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Silly census question
« Reply #32 on: Monday 11 April 16 18:35 BST (UK) »
Again, my grateful thanks to all who have helped and apologies to those I have confused.
Time to put the topic behind me and concentrate on what I know & hope soon to confirm.
Thank you
jj
110416

Offline Guy Etchells

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,632
    • View Profile
Re: Silly census question
« Reply #33 on: Monday 11 April 16 18:44 BST (UK) »
When did Edward Higgs write that, though?

I believe the first edition of Making Sense of the Census by Edward Higgs was in 1989 with an updated version Making Sense of the Census in 2005.
Cheers
Guy
http://anguline.co.uk/Framland/index.htm   The site that gives you facts not promises!
http://burial-inscriptions.co.uk Tombstones & Monumental Inscriptions.

As we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Silly census question
« Reply #34 on: Monday 11 April 16 18:54 BST (UK) »
When did Edward Higgs write that, though?

It does not matter when he wrote it that was the official procedure upto the 1901 census. Of course there were no enumerator's books after that census.

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline ScouseBoy

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,142
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Silly census question
« Reply #35 on: Monday 11 April 16 19:11 BST (UK) »
As the Census usually takes place every ten years, Enumerators are normally specially recruited for a certain period around the date of the Census Day.

They are paid a fee  for the work.  They have to sign a confidentiality declaration.
Civil servants and Local Government Officers often volunteer for Enumerator jobs.

Nursall   ~    Buckinghamshire
Avies ~   Norwich