Author Topic: Have I got the correct family  (Read 3153 times)

Online keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,908
    • View Profile
Re: Have I got the correct family
« Reply #18 on: Friday 15 April 16 19:16 BST (UK) »
Hi again, if the Elizabeth R b c 1875 in 1881 is the one who at least had an illegitimate son George Thomas Haycock,  then her baptism was:-

Elizabeth Rebecca Haycock 27th September 1874 Much Wenlock Father John occ Carpenter Mother Harriet

She married an Alfred James Bagley,  this looks to be her in 1901 census :-

James Alfred Bagley 27 b Broseley
Elizabeth Rebecca 26 b Much Wenlock
Ethel Gertrude 4 b Manchester
Harriet Mary 3 b Manchester
Gladys May 0 b Manchester
Residing Grosvenor Street, Prestwich, Manchester
Census ref RG13/3769/125/27

In 1891 she is Rebecca Haycock aged 16 b Much Wenlock
Census ref RG12/2101/11/16
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 20,255
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Have I got the correct family
« Reply #19 on: Friday 15 April 16 19:31 BST (UK) »
That could explain why Edith and George were with grandparents in 1901 - possibly there as their mother had just had a baby. We don't know that they were actually living there, just that they were there on census night.


Quote
James Alfred Bagley 27 b Broseley       

Could that be where the James on the marriage certificate came from? Not her biological father, but the man who brought her up?
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline artisann

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
  • For all the help I have received ..
    • View Profile
Re: Have I got the correct family
« Reply #20 on: Friday 15 April 16 19:32 BST (UK) »
Hi Keyboard
thank you so much for looking that info up and replying....just shows how much digging has to be done ;D....
Many thanks again though for digging :)

Offline artisann

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
  • For all the help I have received ..
    • View Profile
Re: Have I got the correct family
« Reply #21 on: Friday 15 April 16 19:37 BST (UK) »
Hi groom
well its all fitting together...so am thinking Elizabeth is Ediths mother too?....hope I have got this correct
Many thanks again Groom :)

Online keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,908
    • View Profile
Re: Have I got the correct family
« Reply #22 on: Friday 15 April 16 19:43 BST (UK) »
Hi groom
well its all fitting together...so am thinking Elizabeth is Ediths mother too?....hope I have got this correct
Many thanks again Groom :)

 ;D I am also thinking Elizabeth Rebecca is the mother of Edith, only problem is at present no baptism like George Thomas ( As a matter of interest was held privately)  or a nailed on birth registration on Freebmd?
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline artisann

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
  • For all the help I have received ..
    • View Profile
Re: Have I got the correct family
« Reply #23 on: Friday 15 April 16 19:50 BST (UK) »
Keyboard
Once again thank you for the info... ;)

Online keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,908
    • View Profile
Re: Have I got the correct family
« Reply #24 on: Friday 15 April 16 19:55 BST (UK) »
 ;D Hi from your PM. ( Should have been really posted so all can see)! " Held privately " I would suggest was only in the presence of Elizabeth and the cleric carrying out the baptism,  in the case of both Edith & Elizabeth in Madeley births,  cannot locate with full name?
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline artisann

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
  • For all the help I have received ..
    • View Profile
Re: Have I got the correct family
« Reply #25 on: Friday 15 April 16 20:02 BST (UK) »
Thanks so much Keyboard for explaining ...learn things everyday  ;D
and once again thanks for all your help :)

Offline artisann

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 508
  • For all the help I have received ..
    • View Profile
Re: Have I got the correct family
« Reply #26 on: Friday 15 April 16 20:10 BST (UK) »
Keyboard could I ask if its possible that Edith and Thomas could be twins as they are both aged 7yrs on the 1901. ???