Author Topic: Do these signatures match?  (Read 1176 times)

Offline BradMajors

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Do these signatures match?
« on: Saturday 30 April 16 00:18 BST (UK) »
Do the following attached signatures match?

Offline orkrad

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 499
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Do these signatures match?
« Reply #1 on: Saturday 30 April 16 00:41 BST (UK) »
 Not sure which ones we are being asked to match. The Sarah Williams ones seem ok. As regards John's it seems like he was learning to write and spell his name in extract two. In the third extract the writer (who is possibly  the same person ) appears more confident . Do we presume that there is a time lapse between extract two and three?

Regards Orkrad

Offline BradMajors

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: Do these signatures match?
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 30 April 16 00:44 BST (UK) »
Dates:

1 & 2: 1813
3: 1772
4: 1830

Offline sami

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,905
  • Grannie M
    • View Profile
Re: Do these signatures match?
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 30 April 16 04:00 BST (UK) »
I see No. 1 and 2 Sarah Williams matching. Possibly No. 4 for the writing of the name Sarah.

Not sure about any of the John Williams signatures.

sami
England:  Archer, Bailey, Bates, Blower, Bosworth, Court, Hicklin, Orton, Palmer, Robbins, Sedgwick, Smith, Stevenson, Stone, Varnam, Wakelin, Walker
Canada:  Archer, Walker, Spencer, Shepherd
Australia:  Taplin
South Africa:  Risley


Offline 3sillydogs

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,831
  • Durban South Africa
    • View Profile
Re: Do these signatures match?
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 30 April 16 07:13 BST (UK) »

I would say that the "Sarah" signatures are the same person.

Not too sure about the "John"  The first one looks as if the person is not entirely literate and had just learned to write his name and the other by a person obviously comfortable doing so.  Given the time lapse between them, almost 60 years, it's possible.
Paylet, Pallatt, Morris (Russia, UK) Burke, Hillery, Page, Rumsey, Stevens, Tyne/Thynne(UK)  Landman, van Rooyen, Tyne, Stevens, Rumsey, Visagie, Nell (South Africa)

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,307
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Do these signatures match?
« Reply #5 on: Saturday 30 April 16 07:48 BST (UK) »
Sorry, I'm going to slightly disagree here  :o

If 1 and 2 are in the same year, 1813, then they are not the same Sarah Williams.  Whilst the "Sarah" is very similar, the W in Williams is very different.  I think that 1 and 4 are the same Sarah.

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline maddys52

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,250
  • Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.
    • View Profile
Re: Do these signatures match?
« Reply #6 on: Saturday 30 April 16 08:18 BST (UK) »
I think Sarah looks like the same person signed each.

However, if 3 is 40 years earlier than 1&2, unless he'd had some major health issues, I can't see them being the same person. the way the "n" of John is connected to the "W", and the W itself, which is very distinctive.

Offline Guy Etchells

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,632
    • View Profile
Re: Do these signatures match?
« Reply #7 on: Saturday 30 April 16 08:24 BST (UK) »
I would agree with BumbleB (there are differences between 1 & 4 but they could be due to different quality of pens & parchment/paper etc.
The number 4 Sarah is a much more confident hand.

None of the Johns seem to match.

The problem with making suggestions from a black and white image is we don't know how much has been lost in the scanning; for accurate conclusions we would have to see at least a colour scan of the original though of course sight of the original would be better still.

It is also helpful to see larger sections of the original as we can then see what the texture of the page is like and how the ink runs even if another hand is doing most of the writing. Sometimes the quality of the hand made ink makes signatures by the same person look different.

Cheers
Guy
http://anguline.co.uk/Framland/index.htm   The site that gives you facts not promises!
http://burial-inscriptions.co.uk Tombstones & Monumental Inscriptions.

As we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.