« Reply #39 on: Wednesday 16 May 18 10:40 BST (UK) »
I thought I'd seen a little camera next to the Shrivenham parish records which meant that I could see them at a FHC. I had, but 1871 isn't included. It has been microfiched though, so next time I'm in Salt Lake City....
Hurworth, the later PRs have actually been digitised as they have DGS numbers but they've for some reason not been made accessible. There have been a number of digitised microfilms like this in the catalogue for some time. Some were made accessible I think at the end of February but still waiting for the rest to be resolved. As there are copies of those films at several other FHCs or affiliate libraries, there can't be a access reason for them being unavailable or the microfilm copies would have had to be removed I would have thought. May be worth a message to Familysearch support asking why they aren't available even though there are DGS numbers, but if you do please mention the fact there are copies at other FHCs as their standard reply seems to be "restricted access for contractual reasons" which in this case I don't think applies. Somebody has messed up by the looks of it when they've uploaded the images and not made them accessible. Hopefully the rest will be fixed sometime but when remains to be seen. I know some of the FHCs have been enquiring about this but not getting an answer.
(KENT) Lingwell, Rayment (BUCKS) Read, Hutchins (SRY) Costin, Westbrook (DOR) Gibbs, Goreing (DUR) Green (ESX) Rudland, Malden, Rouse, Boosey (FIFE) Foulis, Russell (NFK) Johnson, Farthing, Purdy, Barsham (GLOS) Collett, Morris, Freebury, May, Kirkman (HERTS) Winchester, Linford (NORTHANTS) Bird, Brimley, Chater, Wilford, Read, Chapman, Jeys, Marston, Lumley (WILTS) Arden, Whatley, Batson, Gleed, Greenhill (SOM) Coombs, Watkins (RUT) Stafford (BERKS) Sansom, Angel, Young, Stratton, Weeks, Day