Author Topic: Adoptions in 1954  (Read 2698 times)

Offline auntie bertie

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
  • Giles the Bakers, Cheap St, Newbury, Berkshire
    • View Profile
Adoptions in 1954
« on: Friday 15 July 16 16:23 BST (UK) »
If someone was adopted in 1954 (Slough) and the birth certificate does not show the father's name, is there any other route to go to try and find him please?
TIA.
Beeson from Buckinghamshire
Freer from Leicestershire
Giles from Berkshire
Green from Birmingham
Gurney from Leicestershire
Heffer from Surrey
Randall from Sussex
Robinson from Hinckley
Wadey from Sussex

Offline ScouseBoy

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,142
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Adoptions in 1954
« Reply #1 on: Friday 15 July 16 16:25 BST (UK) »
Extremely unlikely.

How old was the mother, please?
Nursall   ~    Buckinghamshire
Avies ~   Norwich

Offline KGarrad

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,100
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Adoptions in 1954
« Reply #2 on: Friday 15 July 16 16:41 BST (UK) »
You could try looking for a baptism?
Some priests liked to record the father's name ;D
Garrad (Suffolk, Essex, Somerset), Crocker (Somerset), Vanstone (Devon, Jersey), Sims (Wiltshire), Bridger (Kent)

Offline ScouseBoy

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,142
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Adoptions in 1954
« Reply #3 on: Friday 15 July 16 16:47 BST (UK) »
How old was the child when they were adopted?
Nursall   ~    Buckinghamshire
Avies ~   Norwich


Offline auntie bertie

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
  • Giles the Bakers, Cheap St, Newbury, Berkshire
    • View Profile
Re: Adoptions in 1954
« Reply #4 on: Friday 15 July 16 16:49 BST (UK) »
The child was given up at birth. Mother unmarried etc etc!   I believe the mother was 21 at the time of birth.  The birth certificate does say 'adopted' at the side.
Beeson from Buckinghamshire
Freer from Leicestershire
Giles from Berkshire
Green from Birmingham
Gurney from Leicestershire
Heffer from Surrey
Randall from Sussex
Robinson from Hinckley
Wadey from Sussex

Offline AntonyMMM

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,274
  • Researcher (retired) and former Deputy Registrar
    • View Profile
Re: Adoptions in 1954
« Reply #5 on: Friday 15 July 16 18:25 BST (UK) »
The father may well be named in the adoption papers, or at least there might be some clues to his identity.

If the person is still alive, they can apply for a copy of the adoption file - or if not, then in certain circumstances a relative may be able to request access.

Offline carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,589
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: Adoptions in 1954
« Reply #6 on: Friday 15 July 16 19:08 BST (UK) »
There are instances where the mum may not have known which chap was the father of her baby and would therefore not be able to name anyone.
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline AntonyMMM

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,274
  • Researcher (retired) and former Deputy Registrar
    • View Profile
Re: Adoptions in 1954
« Reply #7 on: Saturday 16 July 16 12:43 BST (UK) »
There are instances where the mum may not have known which chap was the father of her baby and would therefore not be able to name anyone.

Whether an unmarried mother knows who the father is is not really relevant when it comes to birth registration - if she isn't married to him, he doesn't get shown on the birth register unless he is there with her to sign as co-informant.

I have seen quite a number of cases where no father is named on the birth certificate of an adopted child, but the actual adoption papers give all his details.

Offline carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,589
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: Adoptions in 1954
« Reply #8 on: Saturday 16 July 16 12:50 BST (UK) »
There are instances where the mum may not have known which chap was the father of her baby and would therefore not be able to name anyone.

Whether an unmarried mother knows who the father is is not really relevant when it comes to birth registration - if she isn't married to him, he doesn't get shown on the birth register unless he is there with her to sign as co-informant.

I have seen quite a number of cases where no father is named on the birth certificate of an adopted child, but the actual adoption papers give all his details.

I have an instance in the 1960's in Wales where the mother obviously didn't know who the father was and therefore he wasn't named anywhere! Not on the baptism,birth cert or adoption papers.
I'm just pointing out that it is another scenario that you have to be prepared to encounter.
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk