Hi, I'm hoping somebody could help throw some light on the following for me.
My entire family tree seems to hinge on one woman, called Frances/Fanny Mallinson, born around 1807.
Here's what I know:
Frances Mallinson of Barnsley had three illegitimate sons, John Frederick, Benjamin and Richard (the baptism records make no mention of the father(s)) who carried on her Mallinson name. She married Francis Greaves in 1837 (annoyingly just a few months before civil registration was introduced). I'm able to trace her and her children through the census records no problem.
The issue I have is where she came from. There are no Barnsley records I can find to identify her parents, where she was born, etc.
Back when I first started researching my family tree, I accepted a lot of what Ancestry threw at me and drew a connection between this Frances from Barnsley and a Fanny Mallinson from Huddersfield. However, I'm now a lot more skeptical about this and have two halves of a family tree that may or may not be connected.
Here's what I've researched. Based on the various ages on the records (census, burial, death cert, etc.) of Frances, it puts her birth year at between 1805 and 1811, with most records putting her at 1807/08. Fanny's birth was 1807 according to her baptism record.
I've also tried to see if there were any other girls called Frances/Fanny that were born during that period in the Yorkshire area. I only found two others and they both had a traceable history that was unrelated.
Where the real doubt comes in, is the fact Frances never states being born in Huddersfield on any of the records. It's always Barnsley.
So now I enter speculation territory here.
Fanny's parents, John Mallinson and Mary Wilson, seemed to move around a lot, judging by the different places their children were born in. Combined with the fact he worked in textiles, I'm thinking they were very poor. The father died when Fanny was 18. It's possible she went to Barnsley to find work, and that the three illegitimate kids suggests that work wasn't always respectable. Because of this and a variety of other reasons she might have lied about where she originally came from.
Or maybe they really are two different people.
I'd like to try and find some more evidence to confirm or deny this, but I've hit a brick wall. I've researched the obvious sources and am now stumped as to where else to look (if there is indeed anywhere else to look). Any suggestions/thoughts? Or does anyone have knowledge of the cultural/historical situation of that time period and might be able to provide a better explanation of what happened to Frances?
Thanks in advance for any help!