Author Topic: 1836 suffolk burial 30 days after death  (Read 939 times)

Offline Olicana

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
1836 suffolk burial 30 days after death
« on: Friday 27 January 17 22:49 GMT (UK) »
Hi, I have just come across the second " burial 30 days after death" in 1836 in Norton, Suffolk. Can anyone shed a light on why this should be? It seems an awful long time to keep a body in those days. Thank you :)

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,144
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: 1836 suffolk burial 30 days after death
« Reply #1 on: Friday 27 January 17 23:46 GMT (UK) »
What time of the year was it? Could it have been a particularly cold winter when the ground was too hard to dig a grave?
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Olicana

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1836 suffolk burial 30 days after death
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 28 January 17 00:59 GMT (UK) »
Good idea, but it was 31 July 1836. Couldn't really have been a worse time of year for storing a body!

Offline phenolphthalein

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 262
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1836 suffolk burial 30 days after death
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 28 January 17 01:53 GMT (UK) »
Could it have been a found body ie someone found them dead a long time after they were last seen (which then became the date of death)

or the body was recovered sometime after they died -- ie trapped in a mineshaft etc

or was there an inquest and a delay for some reason

or relatives far away who delayed the burial?

or is it a mistranscription -- sometimes dates are elsewhere on page and missed by transcribers


Offline Rosinish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,239
  • PASSED & PAST
    • View Profile
Re: 1836 suffolk burial 30 days after death
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 28 January 17 04:14 GMT (UK) »
Interesting theories phenolphthalein!

Annie
South Uist, Inverness-shire, Scotland:- Bowie, Campbell, Cumming, Currie

Ireland:- Cullen, Flannigan (Derry), Donahoe/Donaghue (variants) (Cork), McCrate (Tipperary), Mellon, Tol(l)and (Donegal & Tyrone)

Newcastle-on-Tyne/Durham (Northumberland):- Harrison, Jude, Kemp, Lunn, Mellon, Robson, Stirling

Kettering, Northampton:- MacKinnon

Canada:- Callaghan, Cumming, MacPhee

"OLD GENEALOGISTS NEVER DIE - THEY JUST LOSE THEIR CENSUS"

Offline Greensleeves

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,495
    • View Profile
Re: 1836 suffolk burial 30 days after death
« Reply #5 on: Saturday 28 January 17 08:11 GMT (UK) »
An awful lot of people drowned in rivers in those days, and it sometimes took a considerable time for the body to be found, if it was washed downstream.  On the NROCAT site (which is actually Norfolk, but also includes a lot of information for Suffolk, there are lists of deaths in villages, and the cause of death.  It is surprising how many have references to the deceased going down to the river to wash, and drowned.
Suffolk: Pearl(e),  Garnham, Southgate, Blo(o)mfield,Grimwood/Grimwade,Josselyn/Gosling
Durham/Yorkshire: Sedgwick/Sidgwick, Shadforth
Ireland: Davis
Norway: Torreson/Torsen/Torrison
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Olicana

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1836 suffolk burial 30 days after death
« Reply #6 on: Saturday 28 January 17 12:25 GMT (UK) »
Thank you for all your replies; some interesting theories. Unfortunately it was before deaths were officially registered, so I presume there is no way of finding the cause of death. I looked at some old Suffolk newspapers, as they often seemed to report accidents, but couldn't find anything.