Author Topic: Kate Mason 1891 Census  (Read 664 times)

Offline ibbotson

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,745
    • View Profile
Kate Mason 1891 Census
« on: Friday 10 February 17 04:58 GMT (UK) »
Could anyone check the details for Kate Mason on the 1891 Census Rg12 / 37/ 564/45. (Born abt 1855 Galway Ireland) Does it say she is Married or Widow?
Ibbotson, de Woolfson, Haynes, Chapman, Shoveler

Online KGarrad

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,104
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Kate Mason 1891 Census
« Reply #1 on: Friday 10 February 17 07:14 GMT (UK) »
Garrad (Suffolk, Essex, Somerset), Crocker (Somerset), Vanstone (Devon, Jersey), Sims (Wiltshire), Bridger (Kent)

Offline AMBLY

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,986
    • View Profile
Re: Kate Mason 1891 Census
« Reply #2 on: Friday 10 February 17 07:16 GMT (UK) »
Took me a while, but went to Family Search and had found it too ;D
Correct reference is : Piece 564 / Folio 45 / Page 37

Just to note: it transcribes as age 36, b abt 1855. It also depicts her address:
Walterloo Road, Aldershot (St Michael), Surrey (reg District Farnham).

Aldershot, Southampton Administrative County (Hampshire) is what the Census actually is. (Farnham RD covered bordering counties Hampshire, Surrey & Sussex). Also her age : on the actual image, there is an enumerator's mark right through the second digit of her age. It could be 36 or 30 - but comparing other 0 and other 6 on the page, I'd almost certainly say this Kate Mason is enumerated as 30.

Cheers
AMBLY
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

"Now that we're all here, I'm not sure if we're all there...."

 Entre los individuos, como entre las naciones, el respeto al derecho ajeno es la paz
 Among individuals, as among nations, respect for the rights of others is peace
    ~Benito Juarez (1806-1872)

Offline ibbotson

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,745
    • View Profile
Re: Kate Mason 1891 Census
« Reply #3 on: Friday 10 February 17 09:03 GMT (UK) »
I think Jane should be 30 becouse according to other Irish details she was born 1861. Then her husband Edward John would have died between 1891 & 1898 becouse he is shown on his daughters Emily marriage certificate as deceased. Many thanks for info.
Ibbotson, de Woolfson, Haynes, Chapman, Shoveler