What I found was the marriage in 1722 of John Peckham to Mary Angel, but of course I was hoping to find a bit more than that as I am unsure of when John was born, and I know Mary was born in Lacock 1704?, so parents information would have been great. They married fcommoneor love only as John was a commoner [my GGGGrandfather] and she came from a wealthy family [and was renounced for any money]. Hope there is someone that can help.
I'm just wondering how you "know" that Mary Angel came from Lacock, as there isn't an obvious connection between there and the Ringwood area. Your suggestion implies that she married at about age 18, which should have needed parental consent, though of course if she eloped she might also have pretended to be older than she was. To demonstrate that she was part of the Lacock family but had been cut off by them, you'd really need to find a will or other evidence to say that they knew she was the wife of John Peckham (but weren't giving her anything).
If you're sure the Ellingham marriage is the correct one, before jumping to conclusions about Lacock it might be worth checking other possibilities nearer at hand. For example, from FamilySearch, a Mary Angell was baptised in Ringwood in 1701. (This is from a film of someone's typed transcript, so obviously it would be important to check the original register.) If nothing else, it would be wise to look into this Mary to see if you can exclude her from the 1722 marriage.
FamilySearch has lots of other possibilities too, but that one seemed to be the closest - and of course, it isn't a complete record of all births/baptisms. Bear in mind too that for some reason, even if you don't specify exact matches only, FamilySearch seems to treat Angel and Angell as separate names, so searching for one won't find the other.
Arthur
