Author Topic: John Haylock  (Read 810 times)

Offline horse000

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 876
  • Ironbridge from the bridge
    • View Profile
Re: John Haylock
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday 15 March 17 07:06 GMT (UK) »
I think this is the same family in 1851 Living at Hall Street, Soham.  The nextdoor family is John Ginn and family - Could the enumerator have made an error with Sarah's sons surname???

Sarah Harlock Head Married 40 Sausage Maker Soham, Cambridgeshire
John    Ginn    Son    17    Ag Lab Soham, Cambridgeshire

Possibly an error, would have to be a memory lapse type error, it is clearly Ginn on the image,

I can't see a John Ginn after 1851 in Soham. There is a John Ginn [10] in 1841 with a William Ginn [60] shoe m, also on Hall Street....

Wondering if using aliases?

Geoff
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Online Kay99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,919
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John Haylock
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday 15 March 17 07:20 GMT (UK) »
I can't see this John Ginn post or pre 1851.   Possibly still favour an error?? :-\

Also what happened to sister Sarah  and father William and why would mother Sarah be still listed a married in 1851??

Kay

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline horse000

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 876
  • Ironbridge from the bridge
    • View Profile
Re: John Haylock
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday 15 March 17 08:21 GMT (UK) »

Also what happened to sister Sarah  and father William and why would mother Sarah be still listed a married in 1851??

Kay

Yeah, odd about still saying married, unless separated.. Occ also changed from laundress to sausage maker..

Young Sarah is possibly b. 2 Aug 1829, same parental details as John.. Not found her after 1841.

Geoff
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk