Did you find a birth record for the 1901 census child?
No birth record on SP for a female James Inglis but there is a Jamesina born a few years later in a completely different area. Unfortunately there are 20 different records for males named James in the Glasgow area (where the 1901 census says he/she was born) and as I ran out of credits checking some others I am not sure if my curiosity has been piqued that far
(The 1901 James is the 8th of 11 children all of the rest have names which are accepted as "normal" gender specific ones)
I HAVE A COUSIN NAMED JAMESINA AND AN AUNT NAMED ROBINA BOTH CALLED AFTER THEIR RESPECTIVE FATHERS JAMES AND ROBERT.
That is the more common version and what I would have expected to see - I have some specific examples in my immediate family but these instances I mentioned of James being used on its own are the first I have come across.
Could it be a transcription error for Jannes (Jane, Janis or Janice)?
Philip
No, the transcriber did a good job - the writing on the original is very neat and very clear
Anything is possible, but it is likely to have been an error (or errors).
My thoughts exactly until I saw the 1841 OPR entry (different family & different area) for the burial of "James daur of John"
Have you found "James" in the 1891 and 1911 censuses? It is so easy to tick the female rather than male child box on any census.
Have you tried looking for the births of female "James"?
James didn't appear in the 1891 census - which originally led me to believe that he died young - although I couldn't find a specific death record - I haven't checked the 1911 census yet - wife has begun to notice how much I've been spending on SP
I think it will have to remain on the curiosity pile for a while longer.
Thanks to all for their input