Author Topic: esther dimmock thorley birth  (Read 1205 times)

Offline kitman64

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 411
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
esther dimmock thorley birth
« on: Friday 21 April 17 16:41 BST (UK) »
looking for birth and parents of esther dimmock born thorley herts c 1833 and marriage to john ring possibly Maidstone kent c 1850 what am I missing here ????
kitman

Offline giggsycat

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 846
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: esther dimmock thorley birth
« Reply #1 on: Friday 21 April 17 17:18 BST (UK) »
Hi Kitman

This from FreeBMD?

Marriages Mar 1859   
Biggs    Mary        Maidstone    2a   522    
Dimmock    Esther        Maidstone    2a   522    
Dimock    Esther        Maidstone    2a   522    
Ring    John                Maidstone    2a   522    
Stroud    Israel        Maidstone    2a   522

Giggsy

Offline kitman64

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 411
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: esther dimmock thorley birth
« Reply #2 on: Friday 21 April 17 17:34 BST (UK) »
thanks for that giggycat I missed that one
kitman

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: esther dimmock thorley birth
« Reply #3 on: Friday 21 April 17 18:14 BST (UK) »
Hi Kitman

This from FreeBMD?

Marriages Mar 1859   
Biggs    Mary        Maidstone    2a   522    
Dimmock    Esther        Maidstone    2a   522    
Dimock    Esther        Maidstone    2a   522    
Ring    John                Maidstone    2a   522    
Stroud    Israel        Maidstone    2a   522

Giggsy

This marriage was 30th March 1859 All Saints, Maidstone

John Ring 31 occ Labourer
Esther Dimmock 28 ( Father John occ Labourer)
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: esther dimmock thorley birth
« Reply #4 on: Friday 21 April 17 18:37 BST (UK) »
Hi in 1851 census I see Esther was a Traveller with a Loveridge family b Thorley.

Baptism Esther DYMOCK 26th May 1832 Thorley Mother Rebecca occ Traveller
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Sueb1953

  • RootsChat Pioneer
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: esther dimmock thorley birth
« Reply #5 on: Friday 21 April 17 20:09 BST (UK) »
Baptised St James the Great Thorley as Esther Dumnock on 26/5/1832 mother Rebecca occupation traveller Hope this will help

Offline kitman64

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 411
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: esther dimmock thorley birth
« Reply #6 on: Friday 21 April 17 21:29 BST (UK) »
many thanks for the info, looks like i'll have to get bm certs for this one, although loathe to after getting so many over the years.
kitman

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: esther dimmock thorley birth
« Reply #7 on: Friday 21 April 17 21:36 BST (UK) »
many thanks for the info, looks like i'll have to get bm certs for this one, although loathe to after getting so many over the years.
kitman

 :) It will be impossible to obtain a "Birth Certificate"  for 1832, marriage may supply witnesses that may help?
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline kitman64

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 411
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: esther dimmock thorley birth
« Reply #8 on: Saturday 22 April 17 11:35 BST (UK) »
yes of course reg didn't start until 1837, although the variation in surnames are not helpful sure enumeraters were not the most intelligent, again thanks for all help on this one
kitman