Author Topic: Define and restore photo of Mam Johnson  (Read 1070 times)

Offline SuzieGirl

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 67
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Define and restore photo of Mam Johnson
« on: Monday 19 June 17 11:47 BST (UK) »
Can anyone restore this photo to make it clearer please
Thank you.

Offline Handypandy

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,582
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Define and restore photo of Mam Johnson
« Reply #1 on: Monday 19 June 17 12:46 BST (UK) »
Not a lot...

Offline McGroger

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,728
  • Convicts, Commoners and Outlaws
    • View Profile
Re: Define and restore photo of Mam Johnson
« Reply #2 on: Monday 19 June 17 14:19 BST (UK) »
My try.
Suzie, is it possible for you to post a higher resolution image? Yours was only 38.6kB and you are allowed up to 500kB. If you could, the restorers could do so much more for you. (Just remember to change the file name if you re-post.)
Cheers, Peter.
Convicts: COSIER (1791); LEADBEATER (1791); SINGLETON (& PARKINSON) (1792); STROUD (1793); BARNES (aka SYDNEY) (1800); DAVIS (1804); CLARK (1806); TYLER (1810); COWEN (1818); ADAMS[ON] (1821); SMITH (1827); WHYBURN (1827); HARBORNE (1828).
Commoners: DOUGAN (1844); FORD (1849); JOHNSTON (1850); BEATTIE (& LONG) (1856); BRICKLEY (1883).
Outlaws: MCGREGOR (1883) & ass. clans, Glasgow, Glenquaich, Glenalmond and Glengyle.

Online japeflakes

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,295
    • View Profile
Re: Define and restore photo of Mam Johnson
« Reply #3 on: Monday 19 June 17 15:14 BST (UK) »
Not a lot to go on. How big is the original?


Offline Mike Morrell (NL)

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
  • Netherlands
    • View Profile
Re: Define and restore photo of Mam Johnson
« Reply #4 on: Monday 19 June 17 15:55 BST (UK) »
Notes added 20/6/2107:
- my apologies for my initial comments on 'resolution' below; they were based on wrong information from 'Windows'
- the scan resolution (300 dpi) is fine; 600 dpi would perhaps have been even better
- everyone so far has posted excellent restores so the file size was not really a problem
- I won't be so quick to jump to wrong conclusions in the future!

Mike

-------------
I have the same feedback as others: for photo's of say, 6" width, scanning them 600 (or at least 300) dots per inch (dpi) is pretty much the norm. Photos are usually printed with a minimum resolution of 300 dpi and at 600 dpi for 'high quality' prints.
For smaller photos of only a couple of inches wide, a higher scanning resolution (600 or 1200 dpi) is much better. Then the finer details (faces) are much clearer. Both in the original and in the restored photos.

A (minimum) scanning resolution of 300 dpi would mean that the photo is about 3/4 of an inch wide and about an inch long. If this does'n't sound right, then you've probably scanned the photos in at too low a resolution. This happens a lot! For some reason, scanners seem to have 'low resolution' set as default.

I suggest you make a re-scan and check the scanning options (resolution). Most modern scanners can do 600 or 1200 dpi. If your scanner resolution is limited to 300 dpi, your local print/copy shop can usually make a higher resolution scan at very little cost.

I'm sure the restores you get back from a higher resolution scan will be much better.

Mike
Photo restorers may re-use and improve on my posted versions. Acknowledgement appreciated.

Online loord74

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,400
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Define and restore photo of Mam Johnson
« Reply #5 on: Monday 19 June 17 16:00 BST (UK) »
enhanced one

Offline Trishanne

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,247
    • View Profile
Re: Define and restore photo of Mam Johnson
« Reply #6 on: Monday 19 June 17 22:30 BST (UK) »
I have straightened her up slightly,
Pat
Bownass - Lancashire & Westmorland
Hoggarth - Lancashire & Westmorland
Jackson- Lancaster
Waller - Dent, Yorkshire dales
Omerod - Lancashire
Redburn - Lancashire
Evans - Hereford

RESTORERS please do not use my restores without my permission THANK YOU

Offline Mike Morrell (NL)

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
  • Netherlands
    • View Profile
Re: Define and restore photo of Mam Johnson
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday 20 June 17 13:18 BST (UK) »
One from me.

PS. My thanks to previous posters for putting me on to the idea of resizing the photo. This made it much easier to work with.
Photo restorers may re-use and improve on my posted versions. Acknowledgement appreciated.

Offline hoobaloo

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,369
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Define and restore photo of Mam Johnson
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday 20 June 17 18:30 BST (UK) »
A late try from me, regards, John.