I am trying to sort out the background of a child born in the Loveday Maternity Hospital in 1911.
He was registered 57 days after the birth by the matron not his mother,His name on the birth certificate has the surname of his adopted family as the third fore name and his mothers surname He was baptised before the registration by his "adopting " parents, they gave him the first two names as on the birth certificate and the added forename being his mother's surname and now his surname is that of the adopted family. They continue to use his birth surname as part of his name (its on military papers and on his death registration) His mother married by banns three months after his birth.
There is a family story that the mother was raped at her employment. Surely if the child was her fiance's they would have kept it, the fact she did not register the child seems to indicate the mother did not want to know the child. Do others think it does point at a rape?
Would the hospital have arranged the "adoption" Is it possible she never saw the child? Would potential adoptive parents go straight to the hospital? We know the adoptive parents had four children three of which died in infancy but they added two more natural children after the adoption.
Oddly their oldest child who grew up and married was not on the father's military papers but the child in question and their two younger sons were The missing son would have been 14 was that considered old enough not to be listed as a dependent?
Looking forward to your ideas about this situation
Many thanks Trees
added the address of the family on the baptism was Farm RD and her address on her marriage was Wheeler St these roads adjoin so was the "adoption"arranged between the families before the birth? would this point to the adoptive father being the actual father?