Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Lucinda(Lucy) Elliott, Born 1901 ?  (Read 766 times)

Offline sam.b

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Lucinda(Lucy) Elliott, Born 1901 ?
« on: Thursday 17 August 17 21:11 BST (UK) »
I am trying to find a Date of Birth for Lucinda (Lucy) Elliott, I have all the Family from the 1911 Irish Census living in Crossgar,Co.Down. All the Family were born in Co.Down, but the Census record for Lucy states she was born in Scotland, Can anyone assist ?
 

Offline Rosinish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,239
  • PASSED & PAST
    • View Profile
Re: Lucinda(Lucy) Elliott, Born 1901 ?
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 17 August 17 21:39 BST (UK) »
How old was she in 1911 & did she have a middle initial?

Possibly;

ELLIOT LUCY 1902
595/ 409
Irvine

or

ELLIOTT LUCY 1906
646/3 287
Partick


Annie
South Uist, Inverness-shire, Scotland:- Bowie, Campbell, Cumming, Currie

Ireland:- Cullen, Flannigan (Derry), Donahoe/Donaghue (variants) (Cork), McCrate (Tipperary), Mellon, Tol(l)and (Donegal & Tyrone)

Newcastle-on-Tyne/Durham (Northumberland):- Harrison, Jude, Kemp, Lunn, Mellon, Robson, Stirling

Kettering, Northampton:- MacKinnon

Canada:- Callaghan, Cumming, MacPhee

"OLD GENEALOGISTS NEVER DIE - THEY JUST LOSE THEIR CENSUS"

Offline MonicaL

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 32,558
  • Girl with firewood, Morar 1910 - MEM Donaldson
    • View Profile
Re: Lucinda(Lucy) Elliott, Born 1901 ?
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 17 August 17 21:46 BST (UK) »
From this census entry from 1911 http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1911/Down/Crossgar/Cluntagh/239354/ possibly that first entry from 1902, Annie?

Monica
Census information Crown Copyright, www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline sam.b

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Lucinda(Lucy) Elliott, Born 1901 ?
« Reply #3 on: Friday 18 August 17 13:06 BST (UK) »
Many thanks to Rosinish and MonicaL. The 1902 Entry is correct. Another problem solved.
Pages: [1]