Author Topic: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, 1818-2011"  (Read 3190 times)

Offline majm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,385
  • NSW 1806 Bowman Flag Ecce signum.
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry problem
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday 22 August 17 01:58 BST (UK) »
As an aside,  one of my elderly rellies has phoned to assure me that C H Clark was assistant at St Andrew's Cathedral and he would be Charles Henry William CLARK, whose son was the Australian historian, Manning Clark.

cable clergy index:  http://anglicanhistory.org/aus/cci/

http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/clark-charles-manning-225

JM

 


The information in my posts is provided for academic and non-commercial research purposes. 
Random Acts of Kindness Given Freely are never Worthless for they are Priceless.
Qui scit et non docet.    Qui docet et non vivit.    Qui nescit et non interrogat.   
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
I do not have a face book or a twitter account.

Offline Jang

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,501
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 22 August 17 02:05 BST (UK) »
Yes, I just logged on again to say it looked like Leichhardt, which makes sense as that is where Mary's sister was living. It seems Edward Elgar was already married at the time (1899 to Minnie Jones). I've just found they had one child, Leonard, born 1902. Edward died 1935, still married.

This ties in with my previous posts: http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=677841.0
and http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=754898.54

I agree that the other comments are most likely on the reverse - they look back to front to me.

That's interesting about C.H. Clark ...

Still hoping to find out one day what became of Enid :-)



England:
Durham: COULSON, FENWICK, HUNTER, LOWES, NAYLOR, ROBSON
Norfolk: DEWING, OUGHTON, TAYLOR,
Lancashire: TWEDDLE
Ireland: KEATING, KIRBY, Limerick; NELSON, Donegal
Scotland: BENNIE, Glasgow; COOK, Renfrewshire; HENDERSON, Alloa/Dundee; HUNTER, Glasgow; KIRKWOOD, Alloa; LAMONT, Dalkeith; YOUNG, Glasgow
Switzerland: VOSTI, DELUBINI
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Johnf04

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 611
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, 1818-2011"
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 22 August 17 02:49 BST (UK) »
Hi there - I've darkened the attachment, to make the faint words easier to read.
Farrell  - Ayrshire
Cairns - Ayrshire
McCann - Ayrshire
Brown - Ayrshire
Petty - Yorkshire, Durham
Lucas - Staffordshire, Durham
Whitaker - Yorkshire
Thackrah - Yorkshire
Stephenson - Durham
Marshall - Yorkshire
Walker - Staffordshire, Southland New Zealand
McCullough -  Antrim, Southland New Zealand,
Cavanagh - Galway, Southland New Zealand
Anthony - Tipperary, Southland New Zealand
Bath - Cornwall, Tasmania, Southland
Brungot - Alesund, Norway; Southland
Bonthron - Fifeshire, Southland

Offline Jang

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,501
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers,
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 22 August 17 03:13 BST (UK) »
Thanks John, I think it's definitely the reverse of the page.

Jan
England:
Durham: COULSON, FENWICK, HUNTER, LOWES, NAYLOR, ROBSON
Norfolk: DEWING, OUGHTON, TAYLOR,
Lancashire: TWEDDLE
Ireland: KEATING, KIRBY, Limerick; NELSON, Donegal
Scotland: BENNIE, Glasgow; COOK, Renfrewshire; HENDERSON, Alloa/Dundee; HUNTER, Glasgow; KIRKWOOD, Alloa; LAMONT, Dalkeith; YOUNG, Glasgow
Switzerland: VOSTI, DELUBINI
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,144
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers,
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday 22 August 17 08:56 BST (UK) »
Thanks John, I think it's definitely the reverse of the page.

Jan

Yes, you only have to look at the reversed date at the end. The marks are nothing to do with the Coulson record.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Johnf04

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 611
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, 1818-2011"
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday 22 August 17 09:06 BST (UK) »
I should have also made a mirror image copy, like here:
Farrell  - Ayrshire
Cairns - Ayrshire
McCann - Ayrshire
Brown - Ayrshire
Petty - Yorkshire, Durham
Lucas - Staffordshire, Durham
Whitaker - Yorkshire
Thackrah - Yorkshire
Stephenson - Durham
Marshall - Yorkshire
Walker - Staffordshire, Southland New Zealand
McCullough -  Antrim, Southland New Zealand,
Cavanagh - Galway, Southland New Zealand
Anthony - Tipperary, Southland New Zealand
Bath - Cornwall, Tasmania, Southland
Brungot - Alesund, Norway; Southland
Bonthron - Fifeshire, Southland

Offline Jang

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,501
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers,
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday 22 August 17 09:07 BST (UK) »
Aha, clever!
England:
Durham: COULSON, FENWICK, HUNTER, LOWES, NAYLOR, ROBSON
Norfolk: DEWING, OUGHTON, TAYLOR,
Lancashire: TWEDDLE
Ireland: KEATING, KIRBY, Limerick; NELSON, Donegal
Scotland: BENNIE, Glasgow; COOK, Renfrewshire; HENDERSON, Alloa/Dundee; HUNTER, Glasgow; KIRKWOOD, Alloa; LAMONT, Dalkeith; YOUNG, Glasgow
Switzerland: VOSTI, DELUBINI
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline majm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,385
  • NSW 1806 Bowman Flag Ecce signum.
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, "
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday 22 August 17 09:09 BST (UK) »
It is of course possible that the 'pencil' comments are NOT pencil comments, but bleed throughs from the other side of the page.    August 4 1869 may well be a bleed through into the 'blank' box in the image I attached.

JM

Yes, I noted the  possible bleed through at reply # 8.  :)

ADD

Good to see confirmation in those additional images, thanks  :)

JM
The information in my posts is provided for academic and non-commercial research purposes. 
Random Acts of Kindness Given Freely are never Worthless for they are Priceless.
Qui scit et non docet.    Qui docet et non vivit.    Qui nescit et non interrogat.   
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
I do not have a face book or a twitter account.