Confused about a date of death for Arthur George Aylott

[medpat]

Just because it doesn't say deceased on the marriage cert. doesn't mean he was alive, I have several relatives who didn't put deceased on the cert. when their father was dead - maybe they weren't asked the question.

 

[jonw65]

She is buried at Chingford Mount Cemetery   

26 February 1907. Interment number 74604.
We should be able to see the image, with more details including her address.
But...

There are a lot of missing folios
I'm disappointed by the Chingford Mount screw up

BUZZ will be disappointed too.
Folios 210 and 211 of the Chingford Burial Register 1906-1907 have been skipped by ancestry.
I noticed some others browsing through. Sarah would have been on 210.

[BUZZ]

I had seen the death in 1907 but seeing it was West Ham wasn't sure.

But the one reason I think you may have found the correct death is that Chingford Mount cemetery is where Arthur and Sarah's youngest child Alexander William was buried in 1905.

Buzz

[jonw65]

Chingford Mount cemetery is where Arthur and Sarah's youngest child Alexander William was buried in 1905.

1 May 1905. Interment Number 68786
That's missing too.
Would be on folio 105 of the 1905 Burial Register.
Folios 105, 106, 107 missing on ancestry.

[jonw65]

Arthur and Sarah's youngest child Alexander William

See Reply #6

AYLOTT, ELIZA  ELIZABETH     mmn LYONS     
1904  June Quarter in SHOREDITCH  Volume 01C  Page 41

Although mmn should be CATTLE. Sarah was a widow when she married Arthur Aylott in 1883. Her father Samuel Cattle was with them in 1891.

[jonw65]

I had seen the death in 1907 but seeing it was West Ham wasn't sure.

You could have mentioned it!

[BUZZ]

Yes I should have mentioned the West Ham death but because I think it's not on any of the family trees on Ancestry it could not be the correct one.

I didn't know about Eliza Elizabeth's short life in 1905 as I was going by the 1901 census.

Also there is a death for a Arthur George Aylott in 1947 at Edmonton with the correct age but because I could not find Arthur in the 1939 register I didn't think this was correct, but maybe he slipped through the net.

Perhaps the Arthur that died in 1947 is also buried at Chingford Mount cemetery.

Regarding the 1911 census in Lincoln on the actual form filled in for Arthur and Sarah there is a question mark for how long they have been married but also it states they have had 5 children so I think this is not the correct Arthur seeing that Sarah Elizabeth died in 1907 unless Arthur was leading a double life at quite a distance.

I have relatives buried at Chingford Mount cemetery so next time I go I will ask at the office if they can give me any information on Sarah and her children and if the 1947 Arthur is buried there.

Buzz

[rosie99]

The 1947 Edmonton death is for an Arthur Aylott no middle initial.  I think that is likely to be the one whose birth was registered in Edmonton reg district in Dec qtr 1865

[BUZZ]

Besides Sarah Elizabeth Aylott dying in 1907 age 41, there is also a death for a Arthur  Aylott age 42, a little bit out on the age for the Arthur that I'm looking for but mistakes happen, and also a Robert Aylott age 58, all in West Ham in the March quarter in 1907 perhaps there was a tragic accident.

Buzz