Thoughts please on this entry as a possibility for
Joseph Murphy born c1876 father William's occupation is a labourer BUT Joseph noted as born B hm
(born Birmingham)
RG11; Piece: 3032; Folio: 107; Page: 28;
82 Devon St
William Murphy 31 South Wales
occ LabourerJane Murphy wife 30 North Ireland
JOSEPH MURPHY son 6 (1875) B hmThomas
MURRAY married wife’s brother 34 North Ireland occ labourer
Plus a boarder and a lodger
1881c https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q27N-F6ZLFurther investigations needed to establish if this
might be the correct Joseph - I cannot as yet find the whereabouts of William, Jane or Joseph Murphy on 1891 census
to confirm one way of the other
I checked to see if there's a bapt. on
Birmingham, England, Church of England Baptisms, 1813-1912 but didn't find anything.
Checked FreeBMD for a birth entry c1876 Warwickshire Joseph Murphy
there's this possibility Birmingham is in the registration district of Aston
Jun 1877 Aston
Joseph Murphy GRO indexes shows
mmn PALLETTThe only Murphy/Pallett marriage I could see
1856 Aston
Thomas Murphy female name on same page Mary Ann
Pallettthere are more children with mmn Pallett on GRO indexes
Checked FreeBMD for a
William Murphy/Jane Murray marriage - nothing
there are plenty of marriages for persons named William Murphy with female name Jane
on same page
For info. only - to keep just in case it relates
I think that Jane Murphy nee Murray's brother Thomas possibly married Alice Jackson 26 on 5th March 1865, his father Patrick occ lab.
Thomas & Alice are together again on 1891 census RG12; Piece: 3021; Folio: 91; Page: 31 with their children Barbara & Thomas and in 1881 Alice Murray married is with her children Barbara & Thomas plus two older girls.
Will continue to look.............