Author Topic: Tenyall  (Read 2992 times)

Offline Neilok64

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 31
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Tenyall
« Reply #9 on: Thursday 05 October 17 23:41 BST (UK) »
Hmm puzzling that one,I haven't seen that one before,Prescott is a registration district and sometimes people would put born Widnes lancashire and registered in Prescot

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,144
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Tenyall
« Reply #10 on: Thursday 05 October 17 23:45 BST (UK) »
Neil, I'm not with you - you said you haven't see the 1901 census that maddy has given you - it is the one you quoted in your first post with Thomas born Wandsworth 1889.

Are you actually looking at images of the census or transcriptions?
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Neilok64

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 31
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Tenyall
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 05 October 17 23:55 BST (UK) »
Just images Groom on my ancestry tree,i was sent a family Gedcom file with part of it done and decided to have a little look into it all,looks like I'm going to have to review it

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,144
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Tenyall
« Reply #12 on: Thursday 05 October 17 23:59 BST (UK) »
As all the children have a mother with a maiden name Card, it does look as if there is something wrong.

In case you don't know the GRO site now shows mother's maiden name.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline maddys52

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,108
  • Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.
    • View Profile
Re: Tenyall
« Reply #13 on: Friday 06 October 17 00:03 BST (UK) »
Just to add also that Charlotte is on the 1911 census as born in Peckham London (not the one in Kent).  ;)

Offline Neilok64

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 31
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Tenyall
« Reply #14 on: Friday 06 October 17 00:03 BST (UK) »
I didn't and thanks for your time,it's just a hobby to me Groom and I'm no expert.

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,144
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Tenyall
« Reply #15 on: Friday 06 October 17 00:05 BST (UK) »
If you need any more help, just ask. It's a hobby to all of us on here, but be warned it soon becomes an addiction.  ;D
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Neilok64

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 31
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Tenyall
« Reply #16 on: Friday 06 October 17 00:09 BST (UK) »
Thanks for your help Maddy,it's cleared up a few things and I didn't even know there was two Peckhams ;-)

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,144
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Tenyall
« Reply #17 on: Friday 06 October 17 00:11 BST (UK) »
Just to add also that Charlotte is on the 1911 census as born in Peckham London (not the one in Kent).  ;)

Could she have lied slightly about her age I wonder?

1871 RG10; Piece: 734; Folio: 70; Page: 5

Charlotte Card aged 17 so born about 1854
Servant
born:   London, England
Civil Parish:   Camberwell
Town:   Peckham
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk