The trees I put on Ancestry are just exports from my family tree software. There are no attached images. If I upload a fresh version, which I do often, then re-attaching image files would take me about five years.
The contents of a certificate I've purchased are normally transcribed into my software and the scan of the certificate is referenced. Whether the transcription makes it into the stuff that Ancestry keeps seems to have varied over the years.
In any case, such certificates have a repository of "Alston certficates file". The paper copies are stuck in a box file, in no particular order, because the electronic version is what I actually use.
If anyone wants to see such a certificate, then I am usually happy to email the image.
When it comes to my One Name Study, the contents of the Ancestry tree are very similar, but I make the scans of the certificates available on my own website. Another copy of my data is available without subscription on RootsWeb, which retains a lot more of the detail I upload. That detail includes the names of the image files as they appear on my laptop, so if there is an image that I've not got round to placing on my website, anyone can ask me for it.
So I'm probably more liberal than most when making things available. My reasoning is along the lines of:
- I've already paid for this research.
- I would have paid even if nobody else ever looked at it.
- I'm proud of my research and happy for others to see it.
- If it helps them on their way to the truth, all the better.
I may be lucky in not coming in contact with anyone "in denial". Most of my conversations have been with people who are happy to accept reasoning backed up by evidence. Many of these conversations have been started by me, pointing out where they have made mistakes and telling them where better evidence is to be found.