Author Topic: Calne Occupation in 1774  (Read 2085 times)

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,137
    • View Profile
Re: Calne Occupation in 1774
« Reply #18 on: Friday 20 October 17 17:12 BST (UK) »
Two other marriages of a John Hand and a Betty/Elizabeth in Calne before Betty Beaven:

12 May 1745 - Elizabeth Bernard
21 August 1757 - Betty Page
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,303
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Calne Occupation in 1774
« Reply #19 on: Friday 20 October 17 17:33 BST (UK) »
Ah, that 1757 marriage fits in well - well done.
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,137
    • View Profile
Re: Calne Occupation in 1774
« Reply #20 on: Friday 20 October 17 17:35 BST (UK) »
Was it just one John Hand  ???

Any burials?
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,303
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Calne Occupation in 1774
« Reply #21 on: Friday 20 October 17 17:55 BST (UK) »
Burials of John Hand at Calne - 1748 - 1812:

24 March 1748/9 - John son of John
31 December 1753 - John son of John
4 April 1764 - John, son of John
15 December 1789 - John Hand, Workhouse, Labourer
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY


Offline arthurk

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,183
    • View Profile
Re: Calne Occupation in 1774
« Reply #22 on: Sunday 10 March 19 09:43 GMT (UK) »
There's now another thread about the term Beaker in Calne registers - see https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=809686.0.

My wife has kindly compared some burial entries with wills and found someone described as a Beaker in the register and Baker in his will (see Reply #2 in that thread), so adding that to BumbleB's findings in Reply #8 here, I think in this case the 'ground-breaking' suggestion has well and truly bitten the dust.
Researching among others:
Bartle, Bilton, Bingley, Campbell, Craven, Emmott, Harcourt, Hirst, Kellet(t), Kennedy,
Meaburn, Mennile/Meynell, Metcalf(e), Palliser, Robinson, Rutter, Shipley, Stow, Wilkinson

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,137
    • View Profile
Re: Calne Occupation in 1774
« Reply #23 on: Sunday 10 March 19 11:36 GMT (UK) »
Could it possibly be an old way of writing  baker   :-\

 ;D

? Did you miss this?
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline arthurk

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,183
    • View Profile
Re: Calne Occupation in 1774
« Reply #24 on: Sunday 10 March 19 13:32 GMT (UK) »
Could it possibly be an old way of writing  baker   :-\

 ;D

? Did you miss this?

No - see the start of my comment at Reply #10. It's just that BumbleB was the one who found the evidence in the registers.

I'm happy to confirm that your initial opinion was correct - as indeed was mine until I started digging around and confusing everyone.  ::)

Including you:
Think I'll now go with the breaker upper, Arthur - given that he's a labourer in the other entries.

O what power I wield!  ;)  :-X
Researching among others:
Bartle, Bilton, Bingley, Campbell, Craven, Emmott, Harcourt, Hirst, Kellet(t), Kennedy,
Meaburn, Mennile/Meynell, Metcalf(e), Palliser, Robinson, Rutter, Shipley, Stow, Wilkinson

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,137
    • View Profile
Re: Calne Occupation in 1774
« Reply #25 on: Sunday 10 March 19 13:36 GMT (UK) »
What about  the previous 12 postings from Bumble and I that you haven't acknowledged  :(

Gadget

Add - from #11onwards
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline arthurk

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,183
    • View Profile
Re: Calne Occupation in 1774
« Reply #26 on: Sunday 10 March 19 13:50 GMT (UK) »
Other than this:
Sketchy timeline - all Calne - all baptisms are for children of John and Betty Hand, but with differing occupations (Labourer, Day Labourer, Beaker and Baker)

on a quick re-read they didn't appear to mention the word Beaker or its possible meaning.
Researching among others:
Bartle, Bilton, Bingley, Campbell, Craven, Emmott, Harcourt, Hirst, Kellet(t), Kennedy,
Meaburn, Mennile/Meynell, Metcalf(e), Palliser, Robinson, Rutter, Shipley, Stow, Wilkinson

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk