William Ellis & Sarah Roe

[horse000]

It's possible (and happened frequently at the time) that the first baby died and then when the next one arrived the parents gave it the name of the deceased baby.
[/quote]

Thanks, Lizzie.. Something to ponder..

Geoff

[horse000]

Thanks, Trish..

Yes, the 1835 death for Sarah is what I have, but not proven..

And William looks to have remarried [Ann, no marriage found] before 1841, that census does look right for age [rounded down] and he was a Shipwright.

The 1851 & 61 look right also..

Offspring also as I have..

The birth that Solidrock found looks good, but as I mentioned in an earlier post there is another with parents = John & Abigail 1787.

Geoff

[horse000]

Possible death for William..

1865 Yarmouth 4B, 9

Age = 78 [GRO]

Geoff

[trish1120]

Hi Geoff,

William does not name a child John or Abigail but does name children Robert/Susan.
So to me more likely his Parents names.

[horse000]

Hi Trish

Yeah... I do 'mither' a bit trying to get the detail correct.. You are right and I have now penciled them in. Given that it is only one of two, not a disaster and easy to rectify should anything arise... The naming 'pattern' does give Robert & Susan an edge.

Many thanks
Geoff