Author Topic: Missing in census 1891?  (Read 1337 times)

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,286
    • View Profile
Re: Missing in census 1891?
« Reply #27 on: Wednesday 22 November 17 19:30 GMT (UK) »
Is this Percy in 1901?

RG13; Piece: 759; Folio: 37; Page: 13
Hadlow Kent

James Sparshott   66      Ag Lab             Washington Sussex
Harriet Sparshott   65                            Wormanhurst, Sussex
Percy Laker   14    grandson                   Reigate
Frank Snashel   32    boarder                      Hadlow, Kent
Elizabeth Richardson   19 grand daughter      Harrow Road, London

Following George & Mary A Wells in 1891/1901 gives:-
1891 George Wells 46 b Wisborough Green
Mary A 44 b Clapham
In Nuthursr
Census ref RG12/826/64/2


George Wells 57 b Rudgwick
Mary A 54 b Clapham
Emmie A Wells 10 Grandaughter b Lower Beeding, Sussex
PETER G Wells 16 Grandson b Reigate
Census ref RG13/948/65/9

Whose child is Emmie A?

OK assuming this is PERCY Grant in 1911 census, just what happens to the Emmie A Wells, found an Emmie Wells of correct yob Single occ Schoolmistress going to India?
If birth of Emmie Agnes is correct when was William Edward Wells born?

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.