Author Topic: Elizabeth Ann (nee Jewell) and James Burns  (Read 2442 times)

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: Elizabeth Ann (nee Jewell) and James Burns
« Reply #27 on: Friday 22 December 17 16:42 GMT (UK) »
Hi keyboard86, Owen is transcribed as Owen BURN, rather than BURNS on 1861 Census, so Mary Jane BURN could be our Mary Jane? The date seems to fit?
:) I know that I posted it! The other early births I can locate as you see, it is just Mary J 9 in 1861 that is causing me problems, eg if Mary Jane Burn is her why no mothers maiden name like her siblings, and also marriage Owen Burn/s to Mary possibly Hall?
Keyboard86

PS and Mary 22 in 1881?
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: Elizabeth Ann (nee Jewell) and James Burns
« Reply #28 on: Friday 22 December 17 17:42 GMT (UK) »
Hi again also note the 1871 family with Anne 17 Julia 15 James 13 Patrick 5 was a Mary Jane 1 the only one I could locate on Free BMD was a Mary Jane M Burns March qtr 1870 Sunderland 10a 502 but for some reason cannot locate on GRO Index?
In addition to 1871 family above Owen/Mary had a son Owen, Sept qtr 1863 Sunderland 10a 413 mmn Hall who dies 1864 Sunderland, Owen Burns snr looks to have died March qtr 1863 Sunderland aged 35, and also a death for a Mary Jane BURN March qtr 1875 Sunderland 10a 49 aged 5
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk