https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/dec/31/domestic-stories-restless-ghosts-a-house-through-time-david-olusoga-social-historyThis is a very interesting article about what historian David Olusoga felt whilst participating in the programme.
He says here that reading the archive documentation sourced by researchers whilst actually in the house itself in Falkner Street led to his feeling of intimacy with some of the previous occupants, 'a close encounter between historian and subject'.
He also says that he felt genuine dislike for some of the people, and he knows well that this is completely unacceptable and unreasonable, but nevertheless this is what he felt.
"To pass judgment on anyone – living or dead – on the basis of a handful of letters and ledger entries is palpably unfair and arguably ridiculous, and yet, in this case, almost impossible to resist."
Personally, I liked the involvement. I was particularly moved by the last episode which discussed, amongst other things, the death of the musician/restaurateur of the bottom flat. It was a moment in time which I recall very forcefully - I had a friend and work colleague who died of AIDS - and is as much a historical event worth remembering as the longer-ago subjects.
I, too, feel very personally involved with those I research. I'm quite aware that what I think about them is very likely wrong, but I feel it anyway.
And I think if people are encouraged to feel involved, then their understanding of history is amplified. Bit like colouring First World War photographs, because suddenly they're not black/white or sepia figments but live young lads just like those you know.
Might it help us remember lessons of the past?
