Author Topic: Jane Bowen Montgomeryshire  (Read 764 times)

Offline rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,224
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Bowen Montgomeryshire
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 07 January 18 15:25 GMT (UK) »
Probably more like it  :-\
RG11/2620 f63 p3
Jane   Bowen   Servant   18   1863   General Servant   born Lydbury North, Shropshire
Living at Middle Woodbatch, Bishops Castle, Clun in the household of John Beddoes Morris
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Online mazi

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,362
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Bowen Montgomeryshire
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 07 January 18 15:28 GMT (UK) »
Probably more like it  :-\
RG11/2620 f63 p3
Jane   Bowen   Servant   18   1863   General Servant   born Lydbury North, Shropshire
Living at Middle Woodbatch, Bishops Castle, Clun in the household of John Beddoes Morris
.             

That was my favourite, there is even a possible father there :) :)

Mike


RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,224
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Bowen Montgomeryshire
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 07 January 18 15:31 GMT (UK) »
I think you may have cracked it Mike  ;D

1871  :-\
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VFVQ-3Y1
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,224
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Bowen Montgomeryshire
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 07 January 18 15:43 GMT (UK) »
1911
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:X72D-XDG

age on transcript possibly wrong  ::)
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,224
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Bowen Montgomeryshire
« Reply #13 on: Sunday 07 January 18 15:48 GMT (UK) »
Possibly Pollie

BATHER, MARY  JANE mmn BOWEN     
1888  June Quarter in CLUN 
Volume 06A  Page 581
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,224
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Bowen Montgomeryshire
« Reply #14 on: Sunday 07 January 18 15:54 GMT (UK) »
Possibly Pollie

BATHER, MARY  JANE mmn BOWEN     
1888  June Quarter in CLUN 
Volume 06A  Page 581

1891
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:W9T7-FT2
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online mazi

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,362
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Bowen Montgomeryshire
« Reply #15 on: Sunday 07 January 18 16:03 GMT (UK) »
It all looks good, but why caersws workhouse I wonder,

Mike

Offline chempat

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,716
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Bowen Montgomeryshire
« Reply #16 on: Sunday 07 January 18 16:25 GMT (UK) »
I cannot see a first marriage for Thomas Coxall nor a possible death for his first wife, also, would he marry someone who is 20 years older, according to that link?

Do you think the age is wrong, and that this is his death
Deaths September quarter 1922
Thomas Coxall age  57 at  Atcham   
so born about 1865

Offline chempat

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,716
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Bowen Montgomeryshire
« Reply #17 on: Sunday 07 January 18 16:31 GMT (UK) »
If Thomas was born then (1865), possibly married Emma Downes in 1885, who could have died in 1901.