Hello
You don't seem to have given any details for the James Henderson you are looking for except that he's in Windmill St on the 1881 census ,which unfortunately I can't find.
You're absolutely right, sorry about that. Here is what I have:
12 June 1831
marriage to Mary Ann Francis
the baptism of one of his children confirms her maiden name was Gibson. She had been married to Edward Francis before.
1841 census
living on Porter Street, St Ann Soho
James Henderson (30), born Middlesex, a tailor
Mary Henderson (35) --> his wife
Emily Henderson (
--> their daughter
Charlotte Henderson (7) --> their daughter
Frances Henderson (5) --> their daughter
Mary Francis (15) --> Mary Ann's daughter with Edward Francis, her 1st husband
Edward Francis (10) --> Mary Ann's son with Edward Francis, her 1st husband
Hellen Francis (9) --> Mary Ann's daughter with Edward Francis, her 1st husband
1851 census
living on Porter Street, St Ann Soho
James Henderson (40), born Westminster St James, a tailor
Mary A. Henderson (49), wife
Emily Henderson (19), daughter
Charlotte Henderson (17), daughter
Frances Henderson (14), daughter
Lucy Henderson (
, daughter
1861 census
living on Castle Street, St Martin in the Fields --> this is the prolongation of Porter Street
James Henderson (50), born Middlesex, a tailor
Mary Ann Henderson (57), wife
Lucy Henderson (18), daughter
Eliza Russell (14), daughter --> in reality, Mary Ann's granddaughter through her daughter Mary Ann Francis
Ellen Carlisle (13), daughter --> in reality, Mary Ann's granddaughter through her daughter Hellen (Ellen, Eleanor) Francis
Edward Francis (10), son --> in reality, Mary Ann's grandson through her son Edward
1871 census
living on St Martin Street, St Martin in the Fields
James Henderson (60), born London St James, a tailor
Mary A. Henderson (67), wife
Eleanor Carlisle (22), granddaughter --> the same Ellen as mentioned in 1861
1881 census
living on King Street, St Anne Soho
with the family of his daughter:
James Henderson (
58), born Windmill Street Westminster, a tailor, widower --> Mary Ann had died in August 1880 at the same address, King Street, with their daughter's family
James Gibbons (39), head
Lucy Laura Gibbons (38), wife --> James Henderson's daughter
Mary Ann Frances Gibbons (16), daughter
Eliza Lucy Gibbons (14), daughter
Margaret Gibbons (11), daughter
James Henderson died November 24th 1881 at the hospital (Poland Street Workhouse, which wasn't a workhouse anymore but a hospital at that time).
I am sure that "my" James Henderson was married to Mary Ann Gibson/Francis.
Seeing a James Henderson on King Street marry a Mary Ann Blaker, makes me wonder if the James Henderson living on King Street with his daughter Lucy is not a different one than mine. But it would be a huge coincidence that two James Hendersons, both tailors, both marry a Mary Ann and both have a daughter Lucy around 1843...
I will check that out. If the King Street James indeed has a daughter Lucy as well, that means he is the one on the 1881 census and the Windmill Street reference is indeed not intended for my James.
EDIT: I remain confident that the James in the 1881 census is mine...
1) he's a tailor, while the one married to Mary Ann Blaker was an "officer in excise"
2) the only Lucy Laura Henderson born in the 1840's is the daughter of James and Mary Ann Gibson (according to the gro index)
3) Lucy Laura named her daughter "Mary Ann Frances", which was her mother's full name before her marriage (Mary Ann Francis)
So, the King Street must be a coincidence. Or... (and now I'm getting all conspiracy theory-ish):
Lucy Laura was born in February 1843. A James Henderson married Mary Ann Blaker in July 1843. James and Mary Ann Gibson have no more children after 1843. Maybe Mary Ann Gibson actually died shortly after Lucy Laura was born, and James remarried soon to have a wife to help him look after the very young children. As they were both "Mary Ann" that doesn't show on the census.
Problems with that:
- both Mary Ann's must have been from the same parish and about the same age
- it doesn't solve the tailor / tax collector problem
- it doesn't explain why his address in 1841 would have been Porter Street, in 1843 King Street, in 1851 Porter Street again, and then in the 1880's King Street all over
So this "theory" can be excluded as well I guess.
Thanks!
Kind regards,
Tom