Author Topic: deciphering names in 1661 Scottish will part 2  (Read 490 times)

Offline ksyw2x

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 18
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
deciphering names in 1661 Scottish will part 2
« on: Saturday 13 January 18 22:17 GMT (UK) »
This is again regarding the will of Christiane Wyllie, 1661, Kilmarnock Ayrshire.

1. "Item be the good wyfe of [  ]". The first letter matches with other C's in the document.
2. "Item be [  ] calderwood in peacockbank"

Thanks,
Katherine

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,431
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: deciphering names in 1661 Scottish will part 2
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 14 January 18 05:30 GMT (UK) »
I think the second is:  Neill calderwood

The first is something like:  Clonhars

The s is a bit different to other final s in the five extracts, but still looks more like s than anything else.

Offline ksyw2x

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 18
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: deciphering names in 1661 Scottish will part 2
« Reply #2 on: Monday 15 January 18 01:29 GMT (UK) »
Thank you! I thought that the second one was Neill just because nothing else fit with the "iell". I considered "Heiw" but there is a clear Hew on the page and the H looks nothing like our likely N. I guess that the N is just a really sloppy N.

Katherine

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,431
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: deciphering names in 1661 Scottish will part 2
« Reply #3 on: Monday 15 January 18 04:15 GMT (UK) »
Take a look at the image attached to this recent thread:

http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=785755.0

The second last word of the first line is Nicholas.  The capital has the same form as your N.

It's a typical mid-seventeenth century form, so not really "sloppy" as such.