Author Topic: Gladys May Frost nee FOorn 1899 Up Cerne  (Read 519 times)

Offline emeltom

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,406
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Gladys May Frost nee FOorn 1899 Up Cerne
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 20 January 18 20:23 GMT (UK) »
Marriage
Harry Frost/Gladys M Foot Jun 1923 Dorchester 5a 807

Birth
Charles G Frost Mar 1926 Dorchester 5a 454 mmn Foot

Possible deaths
Gladys M Frost Mar 1956 Weymouth 6a 785 age 56
Harry Frost Jun 1969 Weymouth 7c 409 dob 20 Feb 1896

Emeltom
Smith Tiplady Boulton Branthwaite King Miller Woolfall Bretherton Archer and many more

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline chempat

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,847
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Gladys May Frost nee FOorn 1899 Up Cerne
« Reply #10 on: Saturday 20 January 18 22:29 GMT (UK) »
Son's death:
Charles George Frost age 63, born 17th January 1926, died July quarter 1989 in the New Forest district.
Probate for him, also.


RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline mark foot

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 357
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Gladys May Frost nee FOorn 1899 Up Cerne
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 21 January 18 08:16 GMT (UK) »
Very many thanks for the info.  Mark

Offline mark foot

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 357
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Gladys May Frost nee FOorn 1899 Up Cerne
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 21 January 18 20:11 GMT (UK) »
Many thanks.

Subject should read Foot instead of FOorn. Hopefully it can be amended as when a merger took place, the wrong one that was sent in error shows and the immediately corrected replacement one that should have replaced it , has been lost.

Thanks again