Author Topic: Florence, Hannah and Emma Bettany  (Read 931 times)

Offline global

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Florence, Hannah and Emma Bettany
« on: Sunday 21 January 18 17:36 GMT (UK) »
Hi Guys

I was wondering if anyone can help to put a bit of life back into this picture please  :) Also, if anyone can tell me any information from looking at the picture that would be great too.

My great grandmother (emma) on the far right was born in 1897, I'm thinking she looks between 13 - 15

Ive copied a dropbox link for the picture -

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ck2ztrzz2y6c1v9/Florence%2C%20Hannah%20and%20Emma.png?dl=0

Many Thanks
Flynn
Bettany
Dawson
Flaherty
Burns

Offline japeflakes

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,304
    • View Profile
Re: Florence, Hannah and Emma Bettany
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 21 January 18 21:18 GMT (UK) »
Very light touch:

Offline Treetotal

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 28,450
    • View Profile
Re: Florence, Hannah and Emma Bettany
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 21 January 18 21:30 GMT (UK) »
Age about thirteen I would say.
Carol
CAPES Hull. KIRK  Leeds, Hull. JONES  Wales,  Lancashire. CARROLL Ireland, Lancashire, U.S.A. BROUGHTON Leicester, Goole, Hull BORRILL  Lincolnshire, Durham, Hull. GROOM  Wishbech, Hull. ANTHONY St. John's Nfld. BUCKNALL Lincolnshire, Hull. BUTT Harbour Grace, Newfoundland. PARSONS  Western Bay, Newfoundland. MONAGHAN  Ireland, U.S.A. PERRY Cheshire, Liverpool.
 
RESTORERS:PLEASE DO NOT USE MY RESTORES WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION - THANK YOU

Offline tommyfromri

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,423
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Florence, Hannah and Emma Bettany
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 21 January 18 23:35 GMT (UK) »
my effort.  , Tommy


Offline McGroger

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,728
  • Convicts, Commoners and Outlaws
    • View Profile
Re: Florence, Hannah and Emma Bettany
« Reply #4 on: Monday 22 January 18 00:20 GMT (UK) »
My try.

Just a tentative suggestion, because I’ve been known to be wrong (often). Could the date be a little later? The girl in the middle looks like she’s wearing a dress styled after a trench coat, albeit with a lace collar, i.e. WW1 influence. I’ve posted a pic of my grandfather with his siblings, taken in about 1919. The girl on the right with similar looks to Emma was 19-20 at the time. Her dress is remarkably similar to the one in the main pic worn by the girl standing up. I think the main pic is a little earlier than mine (girl on left looks more Edwardian), but into the war years, say 1915?

Peter
Convicts: COSIER (1791); LEADBEATER (1791); SINGLETON (& PARKINSON) (1792); STROUD (1793); BARNES (aka SYDNEY) (1800); DAVIS (1804); CLARK (1806); TYLER (1810); COWEN (1818); ADAMS[ON] (1821); SMITH (1827); WHYBURN (1827); HARBORNE (1828).
Commoners: DOUGAN (1844); FORD (1849); JOHNSTON (1850); BEATTIE (& LONG) (1856); BRICKLEY (1883).
Outlaws: MCGREGOR (1883) & ass. clans, Glasgow, Glenquaich, Glenalmond and Glengyle.

Offline pablo59

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 808
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Florence, Hannah and Emma Bettany
« Reply #5 on: Monday 22 January 18 04:40 GMT (UK) »
475567776545))55

Offline global

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Florence, Hannah and Emma Bettany
« Reply #6 on: Monday 22 January 18 12:05 GMT (UK) »
Brilliant, some great work here. Pablo, you touch seems to have some colour getting through. Is there anyway to get a little more in there...

Thanks again, brilliant stuff
Flynn
Bettany
Dawson
Flaherty
Burns

Offline pablo59

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 808
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Florence, Hannah and Emma Bettany
« Reply #7 on: Monday 22 January 18 13:48 GMT (UK) »
377765444665433